Thank you everyone! This is all very reassuring. I am going to try and apply with the 157 just in case, since I'm not caught up in the T-14 necessity. If I'm unhappy with the schools I get into, I am going to take the exam again in the spring and try again next cycle. Good luck everyone!!

Hi all, I think I'm running into a consistent problem. I think I am reading TOO MUCH into the question / words used in attempt to read the questions with a "critical eye." My take was, "wrong" ≠ "should not play," or in other words, one should not play a joke, but not necessarily because it is wrong. Can someone help me resolve this mental pretzel?? I eliminated C because I was thinking the answer needed to include where the joke "should not have been played" explicitly, which COULD be different from a joke being like morally "wrong."

#help (Added by Admin)

I too am looking for a tutor, ~-9/10 as well for October so if there is someone else responding to this post, I also am in need!

Can someone further explain why D is wrong?

#help (Added by Admin)

@ yes!! not by 10 points but def below average, and I left the exam feeling so confident!!

Can you clarify the "no electronics" rule? I was going to take the test in a room that has monitors on the desk and a TV. Is this not allowed, even if they are off?

Everyone's in the same boat. I think it was an error

Same thing and the entire phone line is busy, everyone must be calling. I hope they just release it because this was a terrible fake-out

yes! it first said there was a hold and now that hold message is gone. now just no score shown

Hi! I'm in Chicago but I have the same goals and would love to join the group virtually!

Interested!!!

with B I wonder then why residents would still be asked to cut back on AC use if most of the blackouts from ACs are from businesses and factories?

I was SO thrown off when I was taking my PT but when reviewing it, as soon as I treated it like a depth logic game, it became super quick and easy. You just use it as NFS has to be above D, and W has to be above E. Then you have a bit of a web you can create when they begin overlapping

A. Doesn't address the flaw. It DOES ignore this, technically, so it's correct verbage etc.

B. Okay, it's absence has not always led to failure based on our evidence. Failure has occurred when it has been absent, but that is not the same thing as what B is saying.

C. The sources are not really discussed or shown to be BIASED

D. Required = necessary condition. Yes, it infers that virtue & concern are NECESSARY to success just because it has occurred ("been associated with") DURING failure.

E. I mean no

Wow, I think I am approaching LR questions with TOO much skepticism and actively trying not to draw ANY assumptions, but E as the answer choice does rest on the assumption that YES, flower color IS passed genetically from domesticated radishes to wild radishes. I was looking for a connection that addressed that domesticated radishes are passing its color to the weeds but realizing that this STILL does not draw a connection between this phenomenon and the passing of pesticide resistance phenomenon. Seem on point? I'm realizing that yes in LR questions we do need to just swallow some assumptions and not fixate too much on all the gaps, which seems a bit counterintuitive when our task is to attack assumptions. I'm having a hard time balancing this. Any advice?

#help (Added by Admin)

I thought "normal appearing" had nothing to do with position and more to do with simply looking like an insect biologically...