User Avatar
kfens519
Joined
Apr 2025
Subscription
Free
PrepTests ·
PT151.S2.Q19
User Avatar
kfens519
Thursday, Apr 27 2023

Far be it for me to question JY, but isn't the proper logic: /FS & /WRC ----> /E

or contra positive: E ---> FS or WRC The answer still remains B.?

User Avatar
kfens519
Saturday, Mar 26 2016

Anyway you guys could archive this so we can look at it on-demand ?

User Avatar
kfens519
Sunday, Jan 17 2016

I appreciate the comments and feedback. Thank you.

User Avatar
kfens519
Saturday, Jan 16 2016

Just seems strange to me that in learning something new you would take a complete test that covers everything.

I studied for a financial designation. It was a 3 yr process, each level building on the next. The 3 or 4 comprehensive final practice exams each year, were after all the coursework was done. That measured how much you were progressing with your knowledge. It didn't matter to me what knowledge (or lack thereof) I came with - it is what I had at the end that mattered.

I think I'll take Noobie1's suggestion and skip the PT's until it is all over - but DEFINITELY follow the BR once I get there.

No matter - just curious as to what the specific reason was. I appreciate the feedback. Thank you.

I am just starting the course and targeting the June or December LSAT.

I have a question that may seem trite, but goes to the heart of learning. Why in the world would we be asked to take a practice test (at the beginning of the course) on concepts many of us have never studied? Do you take a logic exam on the first day of class in philosophy? Do you take a geometry "practice test" on the first day of class? I get the measuring "baseline", but shouldn't your baseline be AFTER you have taken the course material ? Your improvement from there is what matters, not from what you walk in with.

I'm just curious as to the reasoning. It makes no sense to me but perhaps I am missing something.

User Avatar
kfens519
Tuesday, Jun 06 2017

definitely intertested

Confirm action

Are you sure?