User Avatar
kianamalek646
Joined
Apr 2025
Subscription
Free
User Avatar
kianamalek646
Tuesday, Feb 25

Can someone explain to me again why "since" would mean that the statement to the right is to be first? (in the example since meant that C --> M, not C --> A --> M

User Avatar
kianamalek646
Monday, Mar 17

#feedback I've done some LSAT questions in the past, and some answer choices were: a. blank is a phenomenon and b. blank is a premise. Maybe I am getting ahead of myself here, but if a premise is considered a phenomenon, how would that work with distinguishing the two

User Avatar
kianamalek646
Sunday, Mar 16

there are so many rules/reversal rules. Its overwhelming to distinguish them all

User Avatar
kianamalek646
Sunday, Mar 16

can someone confirm that this lesson isn't introducing anything new... like we learned this when we learned about conditional statements

User Avatar
kianamalek646
Tuesday, Mar 11

#feedback From my understanding, negating a conditional statement (whether all, some, many, most) means that there has been at leastttt one exception where the rule (ex: If A then B) doesn't hold as opposed to negating all (or some, or most, or many, etc) to none, right?

User Avatar
kianamalek646
Friday, Mar 07

I'm glad I'm not the only one confused

User Avatar
kianamalek646
Thursday, Mar 06

When he says "missing rule," does he mean one of the answers will relay the missing rule? Ex: "Which of the following can be assumed based on the stimulus?" ..We are mapping it the other way to get the answer?

Confirm action

Are you sure?