Anyone Bay Area folks taking the test in June iterested in a discord?
- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
#feedback I've done some LSAT questions in the past, and some answer choices were: a. blank is a phenomenon and b. blank is a premise. Maybe I am getting ahead of myself here, but if a premise is considered a phenomenon, how would that work with distinguishing the two
there are so many rules/reversal rules. Its overwhelming to distinguish them all
can someone confirm that this lesson isn't introducing anything new... like we learned this when we learned about conditional statements
#feedback From my understanding, negating a conditional statement (whether all, some, many, most) means that there has been at leastttt one exception where the rule (ex: If A then B) doesn't hold as opposed to negating all (or some, or most, or many, etc) to none, right?
I'm glad I'm not the only one confused
When he says "missing rule," does he mean one of the answers will relay the missing rule? Ex: "Which of the following can be assumed based on the stimulus?" ..We are mapping it the other way to get the answer?
Can someone explain to me again why "since" would mean that the statement to the right is to be first? (in the example since meant that C --> M, not C --> A --> M