Self-study
Trying one more time today for this cycle.
Good luck to everyone who is taking the Feb LSAT, we got this.
See you all on the other side!!!
legallyhaya
- Joined
- Jun 2025
- Subscription
- Free
Admissions profile
LSAT
142
CAS GPA
3.68
1L START YEAR
2026
Applications
DePaul
In process
DePaul
In process
Illinois - Chicago
Applied
Illinois - Chicago
Applied
Loyola - Chicago
In process
Loyola - Chicago
In process
NIU
In process
NIU
In process
Discussions
I have everything ready to go for this cycle admissions. My question, if, god forbid, i dont get in this cycle, what will happen to the LOR? since they have date where prof usually signs? do i have to get new letters from my profs again or can i use the letters later too (for next cycle)?
I completed my LSAT today. I feel like I flunked. I dont know. I feel like i didn’t get even 1 question right.
I am so done. I am taking Feb too.
legallyhaya
Saturday, Jan 10
Good luck everyone! i will be taking it at 3pm. See you all on the other side!!!
legallyhaya
Friday, Jan 9
i choose the right answer but i am still curious to the explantion that why E is wrong. Because i remeber that for a weaken question, we can choose a alternate explanation. not sure whts going on in here
legallyhaya
Wednesday, Jan 7
I could be wrong since its my first time too, but I am anticipating 4-8 weeks?
legallyhaya
Wednesday, Jan 7
@DannySmall Thanks! I thought i read the instructions where they say to run the Prometric software to check beforehand, but I was confused with timing.
I think I am asking a dumb question. but anyways,
First time taking the LSAT, I have my exam scheduled for 1/10 at 3pm. My question is, do I login to Lawhub at 3pm sharp so should I login and start the check in process 10-15 min early? I dont know how it works. Because I am assuming it will take at least 15 min for the check in process, so my test will be delayed 15 min and I won't start at 3pm technically????
legallyhaya
Wednesday, Jan 7
idk how so many people are excited. i am dying over here. Good Luck though!
legallyhaya
Tuesday, Jan 6
@ajabosompim i totally agree with you, i eliminated it on the basis that it is wrong because it is not citing "sets" correctly.
same