I feel that the instructor for RC does a great job, but whoever is handling the LR stuff really falls short. Everything seems overly complicated and entirely dependent on these visual diagrams.

The whole idea behind LSAC eliminating Logic Games was that visually impaired test takers were at a disadvantage. I can't imagine that any visually impaired student who pays for 7Sage would benefit from this kind of analysis and breakdown. It's too geared towards a specific learning style.

My thought process could be wrong, but the reason I didn't think it was D is because the text mentions how the comparative study reveals common themes from various periods and cultures. However, it does not explicitly or implicitly disclose whether these themes were more or less important in their respective eras.

(D) is alluding to a comparison of importance regarding different time periods, but the stimulus doesn't support that.

I think as far as the spectrum goes, answer D just wasn't the strongest. Although I hated C for the same reason you listed.

I feel like this video did a really poor job of explaining why A and B were incorrect. The guy did a good job of pointing out how B could be a trap question and why C is supported by the text. But he failed to deconstruct the faults in A or B. Even if he had stated that these choices fell slightly closer to the middle of the spectrum, in contrast to C, it would have made more sense. However, to stick those two options squarely in the middle of the spectrum doesn't seem right.

The lessons are good, but the "Take Drill" sections are terrible. The interface sucks