Subscription pricing
.
PT Questions
lenelson2483
- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
lenelson2483
Tuesday, Jan 31 2017
Are you sure that's the right pt, section and problem #?
lenelson2483
Monday, Jan 30 2017
Haha! I love the attitude. I think many of us have had similar experiences. I'm studying for June as well.
lenelson2483
Saturday, Jan 28 2017
Congrats Mikey! When are you taking the exam?
lenelson2483
Thursday, Jan 26 2017
jk! That's exactly where they are.
lenelson2483
Thursday, Jan 26 2017
Wait, where can I find them? I don't see them under the video explanations for each pt...
lenelson2483
Thursday, Jan 26 2017
Thank you!
lenelson2483
Thursday, Jan 26 2017
This problem is tricky because of the subtly of the conclusion and not having an immediate prephrase because of the brief argument.
Thanks!
lenelson2483
Wednesday, Jan 25 2017
@.rizeq I try. hehe.
@ L.M.A.O. I'm glad you figured it out that way instead of asking him. That's awesome.
lenelson2483
Wednesday, Jan 25 2017
I thought he was in a bunk bed with a fishing rod. I may be off...
lenelson2483
Saturday, Dec 24 2016
Congratulations! That's amazing. Very inspiring. Best of luck to you.
lenelson2483
Tuesday, Jan 24 2017
I just tried to like this once, but I guess 7,348 likes is okay as well.
lenelson2483
Monday, Jan 23 2017
I think another great way to think about this problem is that the sufficient condition in the principle (if the instructions were available) is triggered in answer choice C, but the necessary condition from the stimulus (most consumers would find it much easier to put the product together) does not happen therefore answer choice C violates the principle.
I also want to work on more grouping games like pt 68 g3. Thanks!
lenelson2483
Saturday, Feb 18 2017
This was awesome! Thanks so much for the call and advice. @ please do more office hours.
@ @ -yal rock! I expect great things:)
lenelson2483
Thursday, Feb 16 2017
@ I wish I could say I did the legwork, but really, I just copied and pasted...but sometimes that's tedious too!
Below is a list of LR questions that contain numbers and/or percentages. I'm working through these and I thought I would share. Hopefully this is helpful!
PT7, S1, Q11
PT9, S4, Q13
PT11, S2, Q12
PT12, S1, Q8
PT12, S1, Q14
PT12, S1, Q19
PT13, S2, Q18
PT14, S2, Q25
PT14, S4, Q18
PT16, S2, Q9
PT16, S2, Q14
PT16, S2, Q20
PT17, S3, Q24
PT18, S4, Q7
PT19, S4, Q11
PT20, S1, Q24
PT20, S4, Q5
PT20, S4, Q7
PT21, S3, Q3
PT22, S2, Q23
PT22, S4, Q12
PT23, S3, Q16
pt24-s2-q5
pt24-s2-q15
pt24-s3-q25
PT26, S2, Q5
PT26, S3, Q19
PT26, S3, Q24
PT27, S1, Q9
PT27, S1, Q23
PT27, S4, Q6
PT27, S4, Q14
PT28, S3, Q11
PT9, S2, Q17
PT9, S2, Q7
PT29, S1, Q20
PT30, S2, Q4
PT30, S2, Q17
PT31, S2, Q15
PT35, S4, Q4
lenelson2483
Tuesday, Feb 14 2017
@ thank you so much for your response! Very helpful.
The last 3 words of the conclusion states "such as diatoms." Doesn't that only mean that some of the Antarctic algae COULD be diatoms? Or is that stating that diatoms were in fact a large portion of the Antarctic algae? I hesitated on answer choice D because if diatoms weren't the only type of Antarctic algae then this answer choice isn't as relevant. Thanks for any input.
https://classic.7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-19-section-2-question-04/
lenelson2483
Friday, Jan 13 2017
Congrats!
This might seem a bit silly, but in after doing the translations into lawgic exercise...do we always diagram logic whenever we see it in any LSAT question? For instance pt 27 st 1 q 17, I started reading the stem and noticed the logic and diagram quickly but then I didn't really need it. Is that a special case? Does anyone have a recommendation? Thanks!
lenelson2483
Tuesday, Jan 10 2017
Congratulations!! Best of luck to you.
Hey! So I think I'm confusing myself but the game states: Telemarketing will not be given until both Goals and Objections have been given.
then the next rule:
Negotiating will not be given until Persuasion has been given.
I thought I could make both Telemarketing and Negotiating the sufficient, negate them, then make the others the necessary...Why is that not the case?
Thanks in advance for your help!
@Pacifico
I tried to tag you in my comment on pt 20 s4 q22, but I'm not sure if it worked because your name wasn't highlighted like it is in this comment box. Please let me know if you received my original tag. Thanks for your help in advance!
http://classic.7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-20-section-4-question-22/
.
lenelson2483
Saturday, Jan 07 2017
I'll be there!
http://classic.7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-25-section-2-question-21/
Hello! This is my first time posting a question. I am having trouble understanding why e is the correct answer. Is it correct because to if it's unpopular with the teachers than we have to modify and the word modify implies adopt a new policy? So to make the students happy we should adopt a new policy? Because isn't adopting a new policy the necessary condition for it being unpopular with the students? not the teachers?
lenelson2483
Friday, Nov 04 2016
lol @.rizeq
lenelson2483
Friday, Nov 04 2016
i can't join. It says admin didn't arrive
lenelson2483
Thursday, Nov 03 2016
Congratulations Josh!!!!
lenelson2483
Tuesday, Nov 01 2016
I'll def be there!
No worries about the pt # @ , I'm glad we figured it out!
So I'm still working on resolve reconcile explain questions, so take this explanation with a grain of salt. But, this definitely is a tricky question. I can see how you wanted to focus on the weight gain, but to explain a paradox in a stimulus I think we can focus on either group in the comparison to explain the paradox, whether it be the group that maintained their weight or the group that gained weight in this case, even though the support given is only for the group that gained weight.
I can also see why you aren't fond of the wording of C, but I don't think it's necessary to know how likely they are to gain or lose weight, we just need to know that they weigh less-hence, "tend to be leaner" than nonsmokers. The likelihood is irrelevant and I think if it stated "less likely to gain weight" we wouldn't be able to conclude that they actually weigh less than the nonsmokers. What do you think?