I am interested in joining...

I am looking to take the August exam and score in the mid 160s. I am on the east coast but would be open to meeting any time after 4pm EST.

-LC

Similar situation here... I have been studying on and off for a while using the Logical Reasoning Bible and LSAT Trainer. I think studying the fundamentals is good, but I have been seeing the most growth by doing PTs and drilling. My current schedule is to do a PT on Saturday, blind review on Sunday and then selectively drill my weak points during the week.

My issue with C was that it specifically said "students".. This presumes that the students will eventually graduate AND enter the work force.

Wouldn't assuming that an employer chose the plan for them be bringing in outside information? That seems like a far reach. How could that be reasonably assumed? And if this is the case, it could be assumed that they could chose NOT to be covered and chose another plan if Acme wasn't the best? #feedback

I would like to join as well!

#feedback

I am still confused on this one. The author is relying on an absence of evidence to resolve the argument. The evidence that the argument is lacking is how the underinflation or overinflation causes harm. That flaw is outlined in answer choice C.