My issue with C was that it specifically said "students".. This presumes that the students will eventually graduate AND enter the work force.

I am interested in joining...

I am looking to take the August exam and score in the mid 160s. I am on the east coast but would be open to meeting any time after 4pm EST.

-LC

Similar situation here... I have been studying on and off for a while using the Logical Reasoning Bible and LSAT Trainer. I think studying the fundamentals is good, but I have been seeing the most growth by doing PTs and drilling. My current schedule is to do a PT on Saturday, blind review on Sunday and then selectively drill my weak points during the week.

Wouldn't assuming that an employer chose the plan for them be bringing in outside information? That seems like a far reach. How could that be reasonably assumed? And if this is the case, it could be assumed that they could chose NOT to be covered and chose another plan if Acme wasn't the best? #feedback

#feedback

I am still confused on this one. The author is relying on an absence of evidence to resolve the argument. The evidence that the argument is lacking is how the underinflation or overinflation causes harm. That flaw is outlined in answer choice C.

I would like to join as well!

I was stuck between A and D as well, however I ultimately chose A because the stimulus mentions nothing about the effectiveness of the political interest group.

Who's to say the impact to influence legislation equates to effectiveness? Maybe effectiveness could be measured in other aspects such as member involvement. The stimulus is unclear in that regard.

#help #feedback