http://classic.7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-19-section-4-question-07/
in my timed approach I was confident w answer choice E however in the blind review changed my response to D. During blind review I thought I was making an assumption about the bones having been examined. Where as D focused more on what was evident just by excavating the tomb. Help explaining why D is wrong is appreciated.
Thanks! I totally missed the piece about other traders Likely having more diverse coins.
http://classic.7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-23-section-3-question-06/
i had quite a difficult time w/ question 3. During my timed approach I did not find an answer during the blond review I found the answer but only b/c it *seemed* the most plausible.
Excerpt from passage: ...important trading route linking China and Europe and it's a popular stopover for pilgrims on route between Morroco and Mecca.
Answer C: the purse "HAD" been brought to the ancient city by a pilgrim on route between Morocco and Meca
From the excerpt I'm concluding that the purse could potentially been brought by someone from China, Europe, Morocco, or Mecca. From the excerpt are we to assume that people accessing the trading port from China or Europe (don't stop over)?
What threw me off is the word (HAD) in the answer choice. Which is why I was reluctant to choose C as the answer. However, if the assumption is that those accessing the trading port don't stop over then it becomes a little more clear.
Fantastic quiz! Was worried that I wasn't prepared to identify question stems considering up to this point there have been about a million other details to concentrate on...however, the quiz helped to reinforce most of the lessons learned up to this point. In short, I feel 'comfortable' moving forward. Cheers 7sage!