The issue I have with B is that if the people were already going to buy the product without the mailer, then the mailer is bad for the environment because it was entirely unnecessary - a total waste of paper. Why should we assume that just because they didn't get the mailer, they are going to drive? The "would be purchased even without" could be via phone regardless. There's no rule, you only use the phone if you got the mailer...thoughts?

So, I feel like there is a contradiction in LSAT "rules" sometimes. For passage 3 Q20, B is wrong because, although it can be reasonably inferred, it is not explicitly stated. Then, for passage 4 Q25, D is correct even though "flat tax decreases opportunities and incentives for high-income to avoid tax" is not explicitly stated; it can only be inferred. Anyone figure out how to work with this issue? Thanks! #help

Have you contacted any of the admissions offices to ask...? I had the same question.

Thanks so much for this inspiring post! My story is actually quite similar so good to know not alone in it. 3 questions:

How many hours a day did you study during those 3.5 months?

How many full PTs did you do before taking the final test?

When you say you applied late in the cycle, when exactly is “late”?

Thanks so much again and huge congrats!

It's not available for download or printing: https://www.scribd.com/user/445954518/A-Shanaz