@skbonnem316 said:

Is this something that law schools will be able to see? If you're able to remove it via accommodations, would there be any downsides to that from the application perspective (could it be seen undermining the strength of your application or your capabilities, etc)?

no, LSAC will not show law schools about any accommodations.

Okay I picked E too for the same reasons and I think JY just didn't mention this possibility. E says "has not increased" not that they have been lowering the cost of tuition. "has not increased" can also mean stay the same. So, if the tuition stays the same then it is still possible that they are charging too little. The negation to "has not increased" would not be "decreased", it would be that it either stayed the same OR decreased. If the possibility of it staying the same is there then I don't think that is destroying the argument like the negation test is supposed to do.