@hjr210400 After coming back to it, it's a fair bit more obvious that my logic was wrong. I guess I was intending to notate it as many, but I notated it as most. Of course, as you mentioned, there is no most in the stimulus.

I ended up interpreting 'each of the many people' as 'many of the people who did this each got this', so:

P -m-> SC -> RC

does that logically follow from the phrase, or did I just get lucky that the first part of the relationship wasn't asked about?