I already linked my existing LawHub account to 7Sage. I have already taken 6 PTs and reallyyy do not want to manually input every answer again to see my analytics, and just want to link them up. I have lurked around the platform and the last answer to this question was like 4 years ago (and said to manually input all of them)so I was wondering if they made any updates to this. Thanks!
- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
I use the acronym USSR for this:
Understand
1) Subject
2) Substance (perspectives and opinions)
3) Reasons for supporting
i also struggled with 21 but i think it was because of bias and assumptions and not textual support. i chose d because i didn't like any of the other choices. i eliminated choice a because the symbol of the sheep seemed like it got its meaning in an intentional way rather than random; the cross was because sheep have religious significance (bias) and circled because sheep are round (bias and assumption) and so i attributed meaning to it when that wasn't textually supported. i still hate answer choice a though tbh
i also got this question wrong for the same reason, but looking at it now i think that unwise means more in this context and the meaning is more similar to NOTprudent.
why is it unwise for farmers to grow genetically engineered crops? because it is risky and careless. if prudence is showing good judgment, NOTrisky and being careful, then NOTprudent would be an appropriate substitute word for unwise in the conclusion.
therefore, it is a small enough jump that b would be almost identical to the stated conclusion that "it is unwise for farmers to grow such crops"
edit: ~ and * for negation were being really glitchy and striking out or bolding my text so i just said NOT
thank you! this was helpful. i really liked answer choice D but your comment made it more clear why B is better.
Only feedback is to please bring back the videos! For me they are still missing on a lot of the lessons and I really like to have them.
#feedback the drill is being glitchy for me and not creating a set :(
when will the videos be back?
how do i get better at weaken-except questions? i get really confused by the double negative stuff. i'm fine in drills because i know that's what i'm looking for, but on actual practice tests i always do so bad. any tips?
my strategy is to read the passage passionately/dramatically in my head. i do better on the attitude questions when i exaggerate the tone. i didn't find this passage to be particularly neutral since the author explicitly supports the practice and only mentions a minor drawback, which helped me eliminate the (incorrect) answer choices that mentioned concern/skepticism