- Joined
- Jun 2025
- Subscription
- Core
Admissions profile
Discussions
@DaisukeKaga thanks for the tip! will try this in the next applicable example
@jenniferlim4063653 i flagged this question for that reason. there was no other AC better than A, but i still had my doubts on it because of the reasons you stated. however, i guess we just want to weaken the claim so a negative thing about x that y doesn't have works (i guess)
@legallyhaya ^ this is true, but an additional error of E is how it says its quicker and less expensive than X, but then says nothing about beneficial changes in treating these specific illnesses. we know x and y have those same beneficial changes, what if z has none/less? this does nothing to our argument
@SerinJ hi, side question. as someone who is hoping to jump over 10 points between my first official score and future final one, i have heard that i should probably explain this in my law school applications. i'm not sure if you've applied or ever gone through that process, but if so, how did you go about addressing that difference?
Hi all, Phenomenon-hypothesis (LR) is my highest priority in tags for logical reasoning. I know it's not a question type like Weaken, Strengthen, etc., but does anyone have any tips or advice for handling questions with this tag or improving at these? Thanks!
@mikezhu1234371 I know this is a late response, but I had the same exact thoughts. I switched from E to A during BR but still didn't like it because there was 0 mention of whether these keyboards were the type that were more efficient. I think there were other weaknesses in A (like the most wording) that we'd have to make assumptions to cover, and I think it just ends up being too much to cover compared to E. Personally, I eliminated E on the second round because it could totally be false and there in fact could be a reason that you'd want to limit typing speed on computers. E was too strong to me, however now I see my mistake in eliminating it for this potential for falsity because it equally could be true. I was treating it under scrutiny that you would apply to a MBT, but MSS just needs a bit of support it doesn't have to be 100% foolproof.
For passage B, what triangular transaction is taking place? "A victim of blackmail would be harmed if shameful but private information were to be revealed to the world." There's a blackmailer and they have leverage which the victim doesn't want exposed due to harm that would come to them, like reputational harm. But what is the third party within this blackmail triangular structure in Roman law? Where does the passage state/explain this? #help
congrats!! so impressive. hope i can make it up there