Hi 7Sagers, due to ProctorU issues, I wasn't able to even start my Nov Flex today (Wednesday). I spoke to around 8 ProctorU and LSAC agents since my scheduled time regarding this, and I am currently awaiting approval to take a rescheduled Flex on Friday. LSAC said that I'd probably get an approval and that, if so, they'd email me by tomorrow afternoon. However, I am worried that another technical disaster would happen to me on my device even if I retake on Friday. Yesterday, I did a thorough system check with a technician for my test, and I was told that my device was all set. Yet that ended up not being the case today. So, would there be anyone in or near Toronto who has successfully completed their November LSAT Flex and would be willing to lend me the device that they used during that test? I would really appreciate it if I could please borrow your device sometime tomorrow. In return, I will buy you food or maybe a gift card, whichever you feel is appropriate! Thank you so much for considering! :)
- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
@ Your tips are really helpful. Thanks so much! Could you tell us more about how you studied over the month and a half? How many PTs did you do per week?
"Few" translates to "some are, most are not." If you diagram accordingly, you would get "Abstract -M-> /Original -> /Oil," therefore (D) "Abstract -M-> /Oil." You can also revisit the CC lesson on "few." I'm not sure how you arrived at (E), but from my diagram, I can only infer "Critically Acclaimed some Oil -> Original," therefore "CA some Original." Hope this helps!
As stated, the system check didn't give an accurate prediction for test day, so that's why I hope to find a device that has proven successful on a test day. I value privacy myself, but this is the best I could do in this urgent situation.
That's so great that they fixed it for you. Do you know what the problem was and how they solved it?
I cried. I feel like I did everything humanly possible, so I felt discouraged. I'm sure you were upset as well. Do you mean you are using the same device that gave you trouble today?
@ Thanks so much for your dedication and helpful notes!
@ May I also get a copy? Sorry to bother you >_((/p)
@ A+B->D is saying 'if we have the combination of A and B then we have D,' so the contrapositive is 'if there's no D, it must be that A and B weren't combined.' We would represent this by saying /D->/A or /B, which says if there's no D, either we have A but no B, have B but no A, or we have no A and no B
@ i'm interested too! could you message me?
jy's explanations help a lot and we even go overtime to address everyone's issues
@ Thanks so much! :)