you might find that taking a more intuitive approach will get you to be a high scorer

put simply - the conclusion follows the premise that the artifacts were moved because of flooding, however, the archeologist disagrees because they should be kept there for archeological reasons. hello??? what about the flooding?? archeological reasons aren't the only important considerations. A captures this disconnect perfectly.

* copyrights ha

E is the only answer where 'copywrites' is the subject

No it doesn't- it just says storytelling is universal. Says nothing about the types of stories being universal which is what C purports. Yes, C is correct but want to make sure it's clear why.

You're focusing on the wrong part. The last two sentences focus on how that private information is accessed, which is what B is supported by. In order to access private information in a genetic profile, you would need to read a label or records. In order to access private information in an fMRI, all you would need to do is look at a face, and you'd know private information that the patient would maybe like to keep discrete.

B states, "An fMRI has the potential to compromise patient privacy in circumstances in which a genetic profile would not." which is true, according to the stim. Someone could look at a familiar person's fMRI and know that they have, for example, Alzheimer's, which could be something they want to keep private. Would this exact same circumstance happen with genetic profiles? No it would not.

Question - the contrapositive on sufficient conditions confuses me because isn't that saying that the real estate market will only crash if zombies attack NYC, rendering the zombie attack a necessary condition?