Hi, I was wondering if anyone in Dallas would like to form a study group?
- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
took forever but got it right! type shi
Disney is strong bc it uses the word "must", which implies that whatever is being said has to be true (100%). Tiger is uses "not every" and "can" which weaken the argument. The trash can one is last bc it establishes a hypothesis (or a possibility), and thus subjected to criticism.
Tigers:
Platypuses have beak-like mouths and lay eggs. Therefore not every mammal gives live-births.
Disney:
Wake N' Bake (WNB) shareholders can be part of the executive board. Those who can outsmoke the WNB CEO can become an eboard member. All other shareholders must attend a Seth Rogan pottery masterclass to enter the eboard. Chief Keef is a shareholder of WNB and is part of the WNB eboard. Despite this, he has never attended a Seth Rogan pottery masterclass. So, Chief Keef must have outsmoked the CEO.
Trash Bin:
The perfect pizza was found cheese-side down, splattered with no salvable part left in sight, next to the body. "No one outpizzas the hut" was written in marinara sauce, also at the scene of the crime. The Pizza Hut's CEO's confiscated laptop contained marinara residue and threats sent to the victim's hotmail address. As a result, my theory is that the Pizza Hut CEO is guilty, having murdered the victim in fear of competition.
I don't think it's circular reasoning but feel free to correct me if I'm wrong.
My reasoning is as follow:
Premise 1: Extensive Culinary Knowledge (ECK) -> Delicious Omelet (DO)
Premise 2: Chefs -(Most)-> ECK
Conclusion: Chefs -(Most)-> DO
The conclusion is not circular reasoning bc it's following the one inference that can be gathered from the premises:
Chefs -(most)-> ECK -> DO
Therefore Chefs -(most)-> DO
J Y Ping gettin a lil freaky 😳