I agree, at a stoplight a car in front of you might take a right turn at a red light and you might move up so speed at stoplights is not zero. I guess we just have to submit to the idea of "yeah I knew what he meant with the analogy, but my smartass knows the analogy is not perfect"

https://imgur.com/5fSOAmD

Accidentally didnt post my meme

We can rule out B because we not sure on either Ramona's or Martin's stance on this. Martin just used one case of person with a non-technical degree having a "poor" job. Poor job is also in quotations because B would also force you into inferring that being a waiter is indeed a poor job. Just because Martin uses this case does not mean he believes only graduates with degrees in technical jobs get good jobs. If he believes that even at least one person with a non-technical job gets a job then B is not consistent

The question explicitly states that the generators would lower costs explicitly in the category of electricity and electric bills. I selected answer C because I knew in general what it meant, but if you consider it with more detail the cost of purchasing and installation does not typically go into the invoice for electric bills for a companies balance sheet. Installation and purchase would then not directly affect the electric bill in real life, and it is not necessary for these I and P costs to be less to reduce the electric bill.