Subscription pricing
So I realize why it's C (reason for M's comeback "even students in technical majors are requred..."), but initially chose B. Can we rule B out because we are unsure of Ramona's stance on B?
0
So I realize why it's C (reason for M's comeback "even students in technical majors are requred..."), but initially chose B. Can we rule B out because we are unsure of Ramona's stance on B?
1 comments
We can rule out B because we not sure on either Ramona's or Martin's stance on this. Martin just used one case of person with a non-technical degree having a "poor" job. Poor job is also in quotations because B would also force you into inferring that being a waiter is indeed a poor job. Just because Martin uses this case does not mean he believes only graduates with degrees in technical jobs get good jobs. If he believes that even at least one person with a non-technical job gets a job then B is not consistent