@sejlagarbo803 said:

Hi! Are you willing to share what your study schedule was like/whether you have any specific tips?

Hey there! Sorry for the late response. I started studying in May of 2021. I studied every night (using the LSAT Trainer) for one hour per night. Once I had finished all of the curriculum in that book, I started with 7Sage in August of 2021. I increased my study time to about 3-4 hours per night and kept the same routine for about a year until August of 2022. I took a PT every Saturday and during the week I would take 2 sections per night. I also hired a tutor through 7Sage for the last couple months which was helpful but not necessary in my opinion. I hope this is helpful!

I have conditions that I know others have used to get accommodations. I just was wondering how widespread the use was. That's all.

My advice would be to hold off on the PTs until you've completed a majority of the CC. You've only been studying for a month and your PTs will improve with time. You can't become an expert at the LSAT overnight. It took me nearly a year to reach 170. Not saying it will be the same for you but these things take time.

Passage isn't bad the questions are absolutely brutal.

It would not look bad at all. Law schools only care about your top score. This applies to all schools in the T-14 as well. If you think you can score a few points higher, go for it.

Also note that if G is not assigned to b2, F is not assigned to b2. The same goes for W and V.

You got it! Good job.

Splitters are generally defined as being below the 25th on GPA but above the 75th on LSAT. Your GPA is below the 50th percentile but not by much. I wouldn't say you absolutely need a 170 (their 75th LSAT score) to be competitive at UT, especially if you aren't KJD.

The number of PTs you do per week isn't relevant. What is relevant is how intense your review is for each PT you take. I'd rather take 1 PT per week with a significant amount of time allocated for review (why did you get the question wrong? what did you miss in the stimulus or passage? why is the wrong question wrong? why is the right question right?) than take 3 PTs a week and just half ass the review. If you're studying full time I'd probably say 1 or maybe 2 PTs per week with a really good review each time. The other time can be dedicated to individual sections, drilling, etc. Just my two cents.

I'd say shoot your shot but temper your expectations.

For 14, I interpreted the word "profitable" as "increasing respectability." What is wrong with this interpretation? It seems reasonable to me and if that was the interpretation, I think C would be right.

#help (Added by Admin)

It's really up to you. I've never done it that way and have been fine on comparative passages. I usually am either perfect or miss 1 question on comparative passages. I would say try out his strategy and see if it is right for you. If not, just read both together and then dive into the questions. Best of luck!

Exactly. Even in context I think that is a reasonable interpretation.

#21....

So frustrating

Glad I'm not the only one. I average around -4 or -5 right now and got -10..... RIP.

I honestly thought this RC section was one of the hardest of any LSAT. I got destroyed.

Start from the beginning of 7Sage's Core Curriculum and go from there. You'll see plenty of improvement but it won't happen overnight. J.Y. is an absolute genius and really does a great job at making the LSAT easier to understand. Once you're through the entire core curriculum, it just takes repetitions.

I think my trouble with this question was realizing that the necessary condition was even met. Am I supposed to assume that converting from paper to online is the only other cost to be aware of? What if there are some other costs.

#help (Added by Admin)

How do I get this question right no problem but screw up a level 1 question in both timed and BR?..........

I read "palatable" as "potable" and chose A. Goddamit.

Another reason that A is wrong is that it relies on an assumption in order to be correct. Specifically, you're assuming that the judicial body is somehow going to make the therapist not adhere to "patient-client confidentiality." Maybe the judicial body just assigns therapists and then is totally hands off. Wouldn't weaken at all.