B just summarized a point in the stimuli, although E appears to offer some support for the cognitive thinking aspect.
Depending on what behaviors are performed in the wild are assumed in E can support it or not support it, however.
I picked D as if the habitat is not decreasing, perhaps the ozone layer is not being reduced after all. If the ozone was reducing the populations, I would expect there to be a reduction in habitat. That is a reasonable assumption.
Although I see how A does not do much, depending on how you assume D, it can support the conclusion (as a correction answer choice) or actually weaken it, in my opinion. I didn't see how it could strengthen it initially.
I understand why it is E and D, but how does D "attack the premise" again?
I chose D because it appeared to be the most relevant. Although B does say they classify inadequate care when records are not available, it does not say that this is inaccurate - it could have been a coincidence. Also, this could have happened 10 times, whereas the "some" in D could have happened 100 times.
But even without the number comparison, which cannot do as there is no information, D is more relevant. B assumes that the there would be an error when the care record cannot be found.
In B in the explanation, there was an assumption that the classification is an error, although there are no facts to support that. My assumption, also with no facts, says there was not an error, even those the records are lost. One can lose records and still have an accurate account.
This is why some of these LSAT questions are frustrating. I think that picking B was a lucky guess between B and D, unless someone can sell me otherwise. :(
I picked B because driver re-education offers the best chance (from the chance alternatives in the argument, which is jail or drivers ed). Jail time is notgoing to help someone's driving skills. Drivers ed could. I understand not necessarily from all other chances in the world, but the argument does not specify the meaning of "chance". If there is no clear definition, does not seem fair either definition is correct or incorrect.
A at first did not make sense to me because if all go to jail, then why would there be a drivers ed in the first place? Perhaps for people with few demerit points? Then I can see A.
But from the above since "chance" is not specified, that seems okay. I would like to argue this one with LSAC. :)
I picked C at first and the E on the Blind.
I took "excrete" as to eliminate cholesterol from the blood, not generate more. And this excretion could happen at say 100mg, like in the explanation. However, E does cleverly say "may" which makes it better because neither one was clearly said the in the passage.
The "may" made all the difference here.
If I want to go to say, session 18 or 20 after I logged out, is there a way where I can go straight to 18 the next time, or do I just need to start with 1 and click next 17 more times to get to where I left off? Just wondering if there is a quicker way each time I log out.
Matt
Choice C stumped me due to the double negative - "No celestial object that has no lithium is a black dwarf".
Can I substitute the first "No" with "Any"? Now this sentence reads, "Any celestial object that has no lithium is a black dwarf". Now that makes sense to me. And it would still be the correct answer.
I didn't like this question. I read it as the gamma did not actually make it worse, but the fact that they were not solving the problem made it worse. Kind of like, if you are thirsty and you put on sun tan lotion, you will be thirstier, not due to putting on the sun tan lotion, but because you still had not drank anything. Sun tan lotion doesn't make one thirstier.
Also "testing" for gamma does not mean adding gamma to the body. If I test myself for whether or not I have alcohol in my blood - is that similar to drinking a glass of wine? How does "testing" = "adding".
I picked B because at least this one referred to someone who did not have MS. People without MS are not even part of this problem, so I saw this one is the LEAST supported.
Well said tmd. Well said.