- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
Admissions profile
Discussions
Proctors: One proctor in the room, her accent was quite strong but she spoke very slowly so I was still able to understand her.
Facilities: The LSAT was on one floor of the building, very easy to find with multiple testing rooms.
What kind of room: The room was small but everyone had an entire desk to themselves and there were plenty of windows, so the lighting was perfect. Also had a beautiful view of the North Shore mountains and the Lion's Gate bridge so that wasn't too bad either ;)
How many in the room: I think there were about 8 people writing the exam in one room, which was great because it didn't feel crowded at all.
Desks: Desks were huge! And there was only one person per desk, so tons of room!
Left-handed accommodation: N/A
Noise levels: Perfect. I was worried that with the test centre being downtown there would be a lot of traffic/construction noise but it was silent.
Parking: I got a ride down, but I imagine you'd be paying an arm and a leg if you decide to park. It is downtown Vancouver after all :/
Time elapsed from arrival to test: ~30 mins
Irregularities or mishaps: N/A
Other comments: I'd highly recommend this location over BCIT or UBC if you live in the Lower Mainland. Very few people chose this location in comparison.
Would you take the test here again?: I will never take the LSAT again for as long as I live. But if someone put a gun to my head, then yes, I'd chose this location again :D
Date[s] of Exam[s]: Saturday, October 3rd, 2015
Could someone please give me a hand with #11?
From my understanding of the passage, the second paragraph supports the idea that "names often refer to historical or ritual events," while the third paragraph supports the idea that "images used to evoke these events…can be seen as a type of poetic composition." So unless my understanding of the passage structure is off, why wouldn't B be the correct answer choice for #11?
Thanks for your response.
That's what I was originally thinking too, but I'm now not so sure…I think you can display intelligence without necessarily being intelligent. For example, I could be very unintelligent but simply restate something intelligent that I heard someone else say. The fact that I then displayed intelligence doesn't necessarily mean that I am intelligent. So by that logic, couldn't it be the case that being intelligent and displaying intelligence have different requirements?
Hope I'm making sense :)
Shouldn't (E) state that "Displaying intelligence requires the capacity to have emotions" ?
Displaying intelligence and being intelligent are not the same thing…
On that note, wouldn't (A) be correct if it read, "A computer could display intelligence only if it could have emotions" ?
With E, I think it's also helpful to point out the use of the word "considerable." Is considerable environmental damage enough to produce no net reduction in environmental degradation? We don't know.
I understand why B is correct but I'm having trouble understanding why D is incorrect, because isn't D just saying that the argument's reasoning failed to correctly run the contrapositive? In other words, it ignores the fact that the correct contrapositive is /Pass → /A?
Can anyone explain where I'm going wrong?
The passage says that the antidote limits the severity of chicken pox, so wouldn't E contradict this by saying that it contributes to the development of deadlier forms of chicken pox? Or is the distinction that a form of chicken pox is different from chicken pox?
What helped me answer this question correctly was reminding myself not to attack the premises directly. My thought process was, "Ok, I accept that records indicate that premature babies were more likely to have low birth weights and to suffer from health problems, and I accept that these records also indicate that mothers who had adequate prenatal care were less likely to have low birth weight babies. But if I need to weaken the argument, and I can't deny the existence of these records, then there must be something else going on here."
This led me to B. Yeah, mother's who gave birth prematurely are recorded as having received inadequate prenatal care…but where are the actual records of that care? That's the "something else going on" I was looking for.
Yes, that helps…thank you!