So I'm curious what everyone believes are soft factors that help with getting accepted into law school. I had built my undergraduate life under the impression I would be attaining an MSW not a JD and this decision happened rather spontaneously within the last few months, as you can deduce I have not done too much research on getting accepted and would truly appreciate help here (specifically pertaining to the 'Soft factors'). I'm a triple major (does this even matter for law?), I have presented my research at two conferences, published in a criminology journal (first name publication), received grants and fellowships, have held a steady job as a mental health professional aid for two years, and several other involvements/memberships in clubs, internships, etc. I have absolutely no clue if any of this matters? What soft factors are they looking for?
- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
My opinion is to take it. Everyone advocates against that but to be honest you have three takes and you already spent $200. If one is not the best, obviously you'll take it more serious the next go around. I guess it also depends on the score you want. If you only need like a low 150, you can wing it. Again this is my opinion.
Does rank matter if you do not intend to get into a big law firm? I want to be a family lawyer, potentially work as a states attorney. Recently, my professor, a previous public defender, stated that going to law school not in tier 1 would overall be a waste of money and time. I was wondering if this is true to those with my aspirations, as listed above? I am not entirely foolish I know better schools have higher hiring rates and they often have higher salaries, but I want to know if I were to go to a school ranked somewhere between 100-150, would this entirely ruin my chances of doing what I want to do?
I need help with my RC section. I keep doing terrible (10-12 wrong per prep test). Every other section is below 6 wrong which is where I want to be. Any advice?!
@
It was down for me from 2-4 a.m.
It hasn't really messed up much. But to be fair, before I began studying 40 hours a week, I was working 100+ hours... So I never really had a life. I'm also a senior in college and if anything it has given me plenty of excuses to miss things I would have otherwise been forced to go to, such as parties, 'nights out' and awful birthday parties. But that's just me, I enjoy the solitude of being alone. And when I'm not busy studying I value my sleep (: Again I went to an undergrad college over 1000 miles from home so I don't have really any distractions. My husband is incredibly supportive as he had just taken his MCAT so he understands when I prioritize my studies. I never really feel bad missing events and such. Overall the only thing I have sacrificed is money, as I could be working like crazy but decided studying would be more beneficial. Good luck and I'm sorry your new priority in life truly seems to drain your happiness.
I've heard a few mixed reviews on the best time to apply. For example, one article expressed that if you do not apply by the end of October the chances of you getting accepted are substantially more slim. Then another article expressed that as long as it is before January there is no rush. Basically, what I want to know is when is the best time to apply before waiting begins to handicap the chances of being accepted?
The CAS system appears to have a first major and second major category. However, I'm a triple major and was wondering if anyone else has come across this.... Do I only put two of my majors?
@- I do not believe a 170+ is beyond my reach per-say, I just don't have the motivation for that much studying when the university I intend on going to is not even in that ballpark. I am very much destination oriented and I'm pretty much set on it. I'd rather go to a lower ranking school that would ensure my happiness rather than a school that is prestigious but doesn't really appeal to my life standards. And at said school a 160 would still qualify me for a rather hefty scholarship.
I started the post as such because some people can be very 'very' aggressive with their opinions when it comes to T-14 schools. As stated those are not my goals so I am not interested in advice to reach the 170+ tier. Sure, if it happens I won't be upset but I will not put in any extra effort past a comfortable 165. As lazy as that sounds, its my reality.
I've noticed that reading the powerscore books have not really motivated or helped me significantly. Also how many times have you read these books? Are they even advised anymore? Sure there are some general concepts that help but overall barely any improvement.
So I want to know if it would be terrible to just jump into the PT's. Do one a day and review that PT later in the evening. I have done this today and it seems almost more useful than nonstop reading. (I also have the availability of a super genius who helps me with all of the problems I can't get right, even after looking back) I am used to overworking myself so that is not an issue and I have plenty of time.
So I'm aware I'm not trying to get into a T-14 school. I have actually set my eyes on a rather low ranking regional school, where I intend to live after law school. My question is how much studying does it really take to get a 160. I've heard so many mixed reviews that just a few PT's makes breaking into the 60's rather easy. My cold diagnostic was a 152. Looking to hear other people's stories on how much and how long it took to start hitting the 60's. Please just don't say two months, like I want to know how many hours a day/week, what material, ect. Any advice helps.
@.rizeq I have used the bibles and just PT's. I noticed I still get a considerable amount round after BR's, I don't know if it's really helping. I haven't had any real issues with LG for a while (-3 everytime) RC is my worst (9-14 wrong) and LR is all over the place!
So I am scheduled for September, but lately I have been having such inconsistent PT's. From 147-163 within the past three weeks. BR's only seem to make me more uncertain. Goal is 160. Averaging about 156. Any advice?
My exam order was LG,LR, RC (Break), LG, LR. My current issue is that one of the LG sections I felt okay in and the other was awful. I do not remember anything but the letters for each game and therefore do not know which one was the experimental section. Does anyone know how many forms there are for each test, a friend of mine had the same set up and she said the first LG was experimental. I was just wondering if that would also indicate my first LG was also experimental.