- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
From what I have heard, the 7sage interface is almost exactly the same as LSAC's. Yeah, you can underline/highlight as well.
I'm not an admissions counselor, but if I had to guess, I would say your odds are about as good as someone who is around the 50th percentile in both gpa and LSAT. From a pure numbers standpoint, I'd say it's good that you're in the top 25% in regard to GPA as a way to offset being in the bottom 25% of LSAT scores. My only concern is that the LSAT from what I hear tends to weigh more than GPA, so your chances might not be as good as someone who has opposite metrics as you (top 25% LSAT and bottom 25% GPA).
Like I said though, I'm not an admissions counselor so take that info with a grain of salt.
@bensasounian237 I also have the loophole but have only gone a few chapters into it. I've gone through a significant amount of the CC on here in regard to LR, but I'm thinking I'm going to halt and dive into the book. I will say that the LR problem sets on here are fantastic and a great way of practicing specific question types under timed conditions and with automatic tracking.
Also, @merkadoe10724 I found myself getting bogged down by the insane number of problem sets for some sections, so i would do between 2-4 problem sets until I was relatively comfortable with them and then move on to the next section. Moving forward, if I start to see holes in a specific area of LR, I can hop back into some of those problem sets that I left for later.
I know this is two months later, but it might help someone else. It doesn't have to go in front of the chain. It could fall anywhere along the chain. The AC could have been "People who are confident in their own abilities tend to trust other people," but that would perhaps make the question a tad easier since there is less information between conditions. To make the AC similar in difficulty to the one in this example, they might have given us "Those who do not tend to trust other people are not confident in their own abilities," which is the contrapositive of the above statement, and still a correct sufficient condition.