- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
Admissions profile
Discussions
Hi everyone,
I was wondering if there's anyway I could improve how I've been drilling. I started doing questions around the beginning of the month and have been focusing on drilling on LR questions about 5 -10 per day. However, I feel like I've been taking these drills for far too long untimed. Usually I drill 5 questions for about 1 - 2 1/2 hours when doing them. Once I've submitted, I check answers depending on how many I got wrong which can last for up to 2 hours. Filling LR journals take another long time as well. In general, I feel like doing small increments as such eats alot of my time up for the day and feels somewhat ineffective despite trying to score consistently high. If anyone has any suggestions on how to improve drilling/studying for the LSAT, I would much appreciate it. Thx
#help are we implying that increase in sales causes the increase in personal gardens? is this where i have to attack the gap, cuz this sounds like im attacking the premise or adding the reason behind the increase in sale: business gone → business top 2 takes over left over sales→ increase seed sales → cause of personal garden increase
How are you supposed to infer that only "SOME schools that emphasize computer tech" In the stimulus, I don't see anything regarding the nature of some, but for all schools that emphasize computer tech regardless of its degree.
#help (Added by Admin)
Messed this question up because i was thinking in the case of and if then for the AC. Not taking into account indicator words like 'No' limited my view on what the AC should be despite diagramming out the chain correctly.
Could anyone explain how does one reach answer C in regards to the final sentence, "none except the most virtuous deserves praise" ? Would really appreciate if one had the answers to this.
Admin note: edited title; please use the format of "PT#.S#.Q# - [first set of words]"
So I picked C, I can see the whole subset part of this AC but to me it’s just simple to understand that it’s wrong because the stimulus gives no support to REPLACING human cognition. It only gives support for proofs that RELY CRUCIALLY on computers. Two completely different things, you can argue it’s in a similar set but I rather focus on the fact that there is no support explicitly stated.
B is correct because it restates the premise. When I read this AC I was really confused with the triple negative. But when you take the time to parse it out it essentially reads “we can’t be completely sure that there are no errors that humans can’t spot” in other words, there could be errors that humans can’t distinguish. This is exactly what the stimulus says, the reason why proofs relying crucially on computers are classified as having less certainty is because humans can’t verify them.
Reply
vince23heat
7 years ago Unlike 5 likes
I choose C but now I see how it’s talking about a different set. I can see myself choosing B from POE but feeling kinda bad. The “never” in B seems too strong. I can’t predict the future. I know that human cognition alone cannot verify it, but how do you know that i can’t use X for a easy verification? Am I missing anything? I hate that MMS questions gets some leeway in the “right” answer choices, especially when surrounded by attractive trap answer choices –– At least with MBT, you know one is definitely true.
Stuck on either B or E, and E was tempting and decided to pick what was best. Whoops lol
Or is this a phenomena/hypothesis where b/c:
Phenomena: There's an increase in seed sales
Hypothesis: Increase of produce costs → increase in personal gardens