I am there with you as well...third time and I definitely don't know what to think. I am so confused about the logic games. Also, did you guys think the logic and reasoning was freakily easy?? Cause I thought it was so easy and now I am overthinking it...

@ said:

I thought the LR was easy too but I'll see once the scores are released. I had a hard time with the children beaker expanding question. That stumped me for sure.

Ugh I agree. I really want to know the answer to that one lol

@ said:

How do you know which section is experimental? I'm losing my mind right now, because I had really worked very hard on LG and because it was section 5 I feel like it was a throw away. I only prepared for this exam for one month, so I am sorry if I sound like a total idiot. I destroyed the LG section and because of a legit learning disability, I read slowly so I missed the last 5-6 questions of every single LR and the RC sections.. That's not something I can fix. I typically get 98% of the questions I get to, right.

So how do you know which section is experimental? If the LG section was a throw away, I won't hit 160.

Thanks.

Ugh I'm sorry to hear that. You are not alone when it comes to reading slower than others...I'm the same way. You figure out which sections are experimental by first addressing what you had an extra section of. If you have 2 LR sections then neither were experimental. If you had 2 of either RC or LG, but not both, then one of those is experimental. And you figure out which one is experimental by looking at this previous post and see what people posted for having a non-experimental section.

Sorry if that doesn't make sense! Everyone has been discussing the experimentals in this discussion though

Did anyone else feel like the LR was especially easy?? This is the third time I've taken the LSAT and I was shocked by the LR section.