the angry sigh i just let out when he explained the reasoning for C being the right answer

Hi! Count me in!!

I plan to take the LSAT then!! Let's partner up sis!!! :D

nah fr

I thought the same thing!

#help So, for group 4 conditional statements, it doesn't matter whether the subject or the predicate is the necessary condition? I'm a little confused here.

For 2.2, how would you decipher which of the major premises is the sub-conclusion? I feel that both "She must have been near the loudspeaker to hear it." and "There's no way one could be near such a loud noise and not hear it." both support the minor premise. Someone please explain this for me! My brain is in knots LOL