Does anyone know where we can find specific LSAT questions that we starred? I have been looking but could not find them. I appreciate any and all help! :)
- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
Hello, for 6.1, is there a significant difference between "context" and "contextual argument?" I thought context does not contribute to the argument, so the label "contextual argument" for the first two sentences of the prompt makes me a little confused.
The reason I left out answer choice A is because it said "any other method" which I thought was too strong. Why do we ignore the strength of that statement in this case?
Something that helped me is thinking of the LSAT like a game. When you play a game, especially multiplayer, things are too fast for you to have self-doubt. Before a game, you don't think about "Will I be able to hit the ball in the goal?" or "I wonder if I will be .12 seconds above or below the other team in the race." You think of how you can do your best and prepare for the mindset of doing that best. Preparing the mindset, just in the same way you prep for capture the flag or finding the most loot while defending your base, is the best way to overcome self-doubt (as you are eliminating the space for it). Hope this helps!
Is anyone else confused how the last premise is a historical fact?
For these type of questions, will it ever be possible that a LSAT question will have us explain a phenomenon with an answer that in the real world is blatantly false? Like it would make sense to the question, but if you knew enough about such topic, you would know that answer still is not correct.
For question 10, could we conclude that Mr. White grows weed and cooks meth based on the relationship between LSD and meth, or can we simply not make any conclusion on the weed and meth?