User Avatar
msyorku275
Joined
Apr 2025
Subscription
Free
User Avatar
msyorku275
Sunday, Mar 19 2017

I see. But wouldn't interpreting the sentence in this manner ( EJ-->ROW) render answer choice E as a "Must Be True" statement, and therefore the correct answer choice?

The stimulus reads: "Unless our nation redistributes wealth, we will be unable to alleviate economic injustices....." (/ROW-->/EJ; Contrapositive: EJ-->ROW)

[ PT 15, Section 3, Question 7].

Knowing E is not the correct answer, I am still hesitant to interpret ROW as the necessary condition here.

User Avatar
msyorku275
Thursday, Mar 16 2017

Thanks for the responses, everyone! So then, just to sum up, we can conclude that if "A is all that is necessary for B", then "A is sufficient for B". Correct?

User Avatar
msyorku275
Saturday, Sep 16 2017

@ said:

RC was killed for sure !!

Curve should be normal I think due to "easy" LG (quotes cuz I bombed them)

Same here! All because I misread a QG rule or something, to read Q-----G. It was all downhill from there...

User Avatar
msyorku275
Saturday, Sep 16 2017

was the LG section with interviewing (8?) law associates experimental? :(

I understand that "ALL" is a sufficiency indicator word, and "REQUIRE" is a necessity indicator word.

I'm wondering then, what does the phrase "ALL that is REQUIRED" indicated? Does it indicate a biconditional relationship?

Specifically, I'm struggling with the sentence "All that is required to create conditions of economic justice (EJ) is the redistribution of wealth (ROW)" ( PT15, Section3, Question 7, Answer choice E).

Thank!

User Avatar
msyorku275
Tuesday, Jan 10 2017

Can I join as well?

Confirm action

Are you sure?