Hey guys! Here's the official Feb. LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the Feb. 2017 LSAT here!

Here's some ground rules, taken from my usual sticky:

We know that everyone will be excited to discuss what was on the Sept. '17 LSAT, but mentioning specifics about the test (e.g., "I got B for question 6" or "the 3rd LG was sequencing") can get both us and you in a lot of trouble with LSAC. Saying that the test was hard/easy without going into detail is okay, but anything more specific is not okay. LSAC monitors this forum.

If you're unsure what may be too specific, feel free to PM me with what you'd like to post.

The only exception is you can say which sections were real or experimental. For example, the LG with "flowers" was experimental. That's okay.

TL;DR: PLEASE don't talk specifics about September's LSAT!

Here's where you can see the current Real/Experimental Sections:

https://classic.7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/12783/september-2017-lsat-real-experimental-sections-keywords

Have fun discussing!

6

528 comments

  • Saturday, Sep 16, 2017

    One of the most challenging aspects of the test: breaking the seal

    20
  • Saturday, Sep 16, 2017

    Judges opinion made no sense to me. Ugh RC!!!

    9
  • Sunday, Sep 17, 2017

    Okay guys...we need to stop talking about the logic game. People are getting too specific and it's against the LSAC rules. We need to be careful.

    8
  • Thursday, Sep 21, 2017

    Any other first time LSAT takers just hoping and praying they're not taking the December test??!!!

    7
  • Saturday, Sep 16, 2017

    @shanedrider779 dont lose your CANDOR bro. YOUR CANDOR IS IMPORTANT TO THE INTEGRATY OF THE JUDICIARY!

    7
  • Wednesday, Oct 11, 2017

    Is anyone else experiencing perpetual mini heart attacks every time you refresh your email and an email pops up from "law-admissions" or "admissions@dingmilawen269" and you think for a split second that it's from LSAC but it's actually just from 1 of the 80,000 law schools sending you advertisements for their school?

    6
  • Tuesday, Oct 3, 2017

    The rules governing score release dates are a very closely guarded secret held by The LSAC Board of Trustees, pictured below. There's no way to know what they might do until they've done it.

    https://media.licdn.com/mpr/mpr/AAEAAQAAAAAAAASRAAAAJGZhZGM5NGY3LTY0OTMtNGRiMC1iMjhjLTRjYzE1OGY2YjMxMw.jpg

    6
  • Wednesday, Sep 20, 2017

    @pcainti665 @nickdarby28

    You guys are summing up exaaaaaaaactly how I felt. During PTs I feel like I'm really understanding each question, parsing through all the answers, and picking the right choice. But on the real LSAT, it felt robotic..it felt like I was in some sort of flow state, or my mind was just on auto-pilot. I don't remember most of the questions; I was just going..like I was picking answers based on intuition and not reasoning...

    Because of that I have no idea how I did..maybe my intuition is really strong? But maybe it failed me. I just don't know. It felt surreal, like I wan't actually there...

    @bswise2931

    I'm hoping for like a -14 curve :) but since the LG was so easy idk if that's gonna happen. I think optmistically a -11 is a best case scenario.

    5
  • Sunday, Sep 17, 2017

    r we gray yet

    5
  • Saturday, Sep 16, 2017

    Heart racing now haha

    5
  • Saturday, Sep 16, 2017

    Team Homestead, by the way.

    Down with Bristol.

    5
  • Saturday, Sep 16, 2017

    I'll remember more as I think about it but at very least:

    LR1 - moose and deer; modern usages of land measurement

    LR2 - can’t remember

    LR3 - bike sharing; meteorologists’ forecasts

    RC1 - native language preservation; judges’ honesty; Freud/Marx; can’t remember the other

    I thought the RC was unusually difficult, and L1 (for me) was harder than the other two. Not sure which was experimental.

    5
  • Wednesday, Oct 4, 2017

    LSAC can you just give me my 120 already so I can move on

    4
  • Monday, Oct 2, 2017

    @zmeeker91389 said:

    @pcainti665 said:

    Guys....I just realized, if the test scores are delayed by a day....we will get out scores back on OCTOBER Friday the 13th. I almost think the LSAC is evil enough to do this just for "fun"....

    No way they're releasing scores Friday the 13th. They wouldn't... would they?

    This is the LSAC. The same company that makes us wait a month for a score on a ScanTron test...

    4
  • Saturday, Sep 23, 2017

    @81974 said:

    @davidjamessutton1955 said:

    @81974 said:

    "dillon.7sa> @davidjamessutton1955 said:

    Any other first time LSAT takers just hoping and praying they're not taking the December test??!!!

    Um. Yes. That'll be me.

    I told myself (as I'm sure countless others have) that I'm just going with this one score. I felt good about my performance immediately after I finished the LSAT but that damn doubt seems to grow a little every day!

    Same on all accounts. I have no intention of taking it again, but I kept all my books because at the same time I'm like...... did I actually get the score though?

    Absolutely. My books and notebook are on standby because if I underperformed they'll be my first stop (after the liquor cabinet of course lol).

    4
  • Monday, Sep 18, 2017

    does anyone else feel really foggy about how they did? Like I came out it confused because I didn’t think any particular section was unreasonably difficult (expect that experimental RC); however, I also don’t feel really confident either. I feel like for any section I could have missed 3 more than my average, but I can’t point to any questions that gave me more trouble than any of the PTs

    4
  • Monday, Sep 18, 2017

    If you're going to discuss the September 2017 LSAT, PLEASE read the rules! I've seen so many broken rules in the past few days.

    4
  • Sunday, Sep 17, 2017

    Just gonna throw this out there. After 2 and a half months of not drinking for the "boot camp" stage of my preparation, I grabbed a Guinness pretty much immediately after my test. And it was the best thing I've ever tasted. I let like a baby who rediscovered milk.

    4
  • Saturday, Sep 16, 2017

    @pcainti665 said:

    @shanedrider779 said:

    @pcainti665 said:

    Isn't it possible to have the same section order (LR LG LR LR RC) but not have the LR's in the same order? Can't my third section be someone else's first? Etc? How can you determine from order alone?

    yeah, totally possible.

    did u start drinking yet

    TBH I'm in my home alone. Stairing at a wall....it's all I can get myself to do...hahaha

    drinnnnnkkkkkkkk

    I may seem all cheery but I'm dying on the inside from this -27 on RC I'm about to get hit by

    4
  • Saturday, Sep 16, 2017

    Literally considering canceling over how bad the RC was. Like the first article I remember being very fair and the rest was a train wreck.

    4
  • Wednesday, Oct 11, 2017

    I had a dream that I got a 150 on this test. It was a horrible feeling and it was so vivid that I couldn't shake the feeling the entire day! Ugh

    3
  • Saturday, Oct 7, 2017

    173 on a PT yesterday. So depressing that my September score is going to be no where near that, thank you so damn much for that RC section, LSAC. Ugh, December is my last chance because I need to move the hell on after that!!

    3
  • Sunday, Sep 24, 2017

    I wanted to let you all know that I just unpacked my one gallon plastic ziploc bag from test day. It still had snacks!

    3
  • Monday, Sep 18, 2017

    My first section of the test was an experimental LG so gotta love using all that energy before it even counts.

    3
  • Monday, Sep 18, 2017

    Does anyone else feel like the whole test was a blur? If it was not for this discussion thread, I would not remember a dang thing. I'm reading through these comments and I'm like yea...I guess I remember that? But it all just feels like a dream.

    The only thing I remember is that I had 2 RC sections. Regarding the first one, I felt like I didn't perform as well as normally and the second one felt fine. So I made the conscious effort to remember 1 passage topic from each so I can verify which was the experimental section (which turned out to be the first one-- Praise the Lord!). However, if I hadn't done that, I likely would have forgotten everything.

    Anyone else experience this?

    3

Confirm action

Are you sure?