Hi all,
So I completed the CC the other week (I believe the exact day was Feb 22 or something), and I want to know what PTs I should focus on. I'd like to take the exam either in June, or August as my failsafe if I'm below where I want to be PT-wise. To provide a frame of reference, I began with PT 56 on Feb 24, but I completed Bring 58 this morning (Mar 5). At this pace, I'm averaging 1 to 2 per week, and obviously if I try to take every single one chronologically, even through June, I won't get past the mid- to upper-70s. That said, I also want to save some in case I have to retake (which I really don't want to do with the shift back to 4 section exams after the June Flex). Thoughts? To any of you who have completed your LSAT journey, how did you space it out? Is it a bad idea to move back chronologically?
Ok, so just move on. I don't think a question stem like this will ever rear its ugly head again. BUT, if we're really interested...
It's trying to get you to weaken an additional hypothetical statement made by M. M already made one statement. That was about how so few people between a given age range use their left hand. Q responded saying yeah, sure, but that's because that generation were punished as children for using their left hands.
Now, the answer choices introduce new statements, that would hypothetically be made by M to weaken. Answer choices B, C, D, and E actually just corroborate what Q said. So, would that counter? Nope! In fact, it'd just be Q agreeing with M, if M said what ACs B,C, D, and E say. You're therefore left with A.
This is just a really wonky question stem that you'll never see again. The rumor is that the LSAC changed out the test writers and strategies somewhere around PT 20. Anything before that, while still exercising that LSAT part of your brain, just isn't nearly as useful as PT 20+. To go back to your original question of classification: how do you classify? You just don't.