Can someone better explain why D is wrong? I took class of individuals to mean the class of extreme insomniacs. I understand why it's C but need a better understanding of why its not D
statistically scores usually improve the second time, it was probably due to your nerves. I invested in a tutor on wyzant and it greatly improved my LR, i would def. suggest just 2-3 sessions to cover weakness areas. You got this! I take my exam next week, so nervous
Does anyone relate or have a possible explanation on why my score has been consistently higher on lawhub PT than 7sage? Lawhub I score between 159-161 and on 7sage I get 154-155! What is going on, need advice Im starting to freak out, my exam is in a week help!
Omg Im struggling with the same thing, stuck in the 155s & blind reviewing higher. Im getting burnt out just doing drills. What did you do to make such a big jump, rlly need some advice for how you did this!
jeez, 8 hours how r ur eyes? Definitely possible. Anyone that studies at all to moderate should be averaging 150-155s. How are you Blind Reviews when you take your Ptests? Your highest blind review score avg. measures your maximum potentially currently.
just keep at it, its not about the hours you study but how efficient you are. Dont skim through, rlly try to understand basics of conditional logic, diagramming it. Once you learn the basics your score will jump up. I went from first diagnostic of 148 to 152s, 155, now im averaging 160. But that took course of 3 months.
If you look on LawHub, there is a practice one that is exactly like the real one. 15 minutes of outline then 35 or 45 typing I think . You can practice as if it's the real thing on there. You also get days before and after exam date to complete it, I'd recommend doing it after to have more time to prep for the test
Hi guys, September test date approaching and getting extremely anxious. This is first time I'm taking LSAT, I need a 160. I've been PTing and my lowest 2 were 157 & 159, then mostly 160-161. For those that have taken it, have you found that PT genuinely reflect the real score? Or does your real score turn out higher or lower than what you were normally expecting?
this is the type of question u just admit u got wrong and will never understand...
I feel like im Just matching the wording/reasoning. I'm not really "deep diving," is this what everyone else is doing? Should I be really understanding the content more because its so wordy.
I thought it would be E because "flourish," how can the bush
"flourish" if they the soils are not comparatively similar?
Even just the language of the wrong answers were a signal. POE helped alot here. The argument is that it was MISLEADING, no one cares what he "thought" or what "would" happen. That's what helped me here.
First time through I got 2 wrong, and then blind review I took my time and mapped it out and got it all right. But, how can I map everything out on the real exam when there's a time limit?
this sucks
arent volcanic reactions natural causes?
This one confuses me, if I negate A and E they both work. And i can understand why A, but why not E if you negate
"the interests ALWAYS coincide" then they would both be obligated becausse it's in both their best interests