Admissions profile

LSAT

Not provided

CAS GPA

Not provided

1L START YEAR

Not provided

Discussions

General

•

Thursday, Jul 18 2024

nathanwilson92339

Question about obsolete prep tests

Hello, I took my second prep test today and took the digital version from may 2020. However, I am taking the test in September after the logic games are removed, so I took it under the "current format" The test had three LR sections and one reading comprehension section.

I am wondering how it works when obsolete tests are changed to current ones.

I am also wondering if this affects the difficulty of the test as I have not studied even half of the LR question formats but I did ridiculously well, far better than my diagnostic test.

Thanks for any feedback!

Lessons · Lesson 2 - Schoolchildren

nathanwilson92339

Friday, Jul 12 2024

Lessons · Most Before Most

nathanwilson92339

Wednesday, Jul 03 2024

They are different sets. it would be valid if it said most almonds are produced in Cali, Most almonds produced in Cali are exported to Brasil. Therefore, some AKA atleast one almond is exported to Brazil.

Almonds could only make up half of a percent of the produce from california so even if 99.5% of califonias produce is exported, there could still be no almonds in that group.

idk if this is helpful and I could be wrong but it helped me understand it

Lessons · Skill Builder - Draw Valid Conclusions 1

nathanwilson92339

Friday, Jun 07 2024

The statement just says that revolution must follow if there is a decline, it does not mean that there wont be a revolt even without a decline, there could still be a revolt over something completely different.

Lessons · Skill Builder - Draw Valid Conclusions 1

nathanwilson92339

Friday, Jun 07 2024

You just need to simplify the statement and ignore any pre-conceived knowledge or ideas. The argument states that everyone who attended rsvp'd and rudy did not, thus he did not attend. Whether rudy tried to get in or whatever is irrelevant because we know that he did not rsvp and thus he absolutely could not have attended.

Idk if this is helpful or not but basically its important to acknowledge that we are just looking at the information that we are given and the form its presented in, try to ignore everything else that you assume based on anything outside of the statement.

Lessons · Skill Builder - For, since, because

nathanwilson92339

Saturday, May 18 2024

Also likely to try to get us comfortable with ignoring the language in favour of the argument as the lsat often uses intentionally misleading and difficult wording