finally done with the LR curiculum 🥳🥳 congrats everyone!!

Not sure if this is fully correct but I am pretty sure its because of the word "for", indicating that a premise is following behind it. This makes the claim about individual freedom (A)-> social integrity (B) the premise to the conclusion that individual freedom (A)-> rule of law (C). If you know the final conclusion is individual freedom (A) -> rule of law (C), and you know that individual freedom (A)-> social integrity (B) based on a premise to that conclusion, then you need to find the answer choice that bridges social integrity (B) -> rule of law (C), so that the conclusion of individual freedom (A) -> rule of law (C) becomes valid.

Not quite, in the application, we do not know if Healy's said that the vase was from the 18th century in order to deliberately mislead buyers, or if it was for some other reason. We need to find an answer choice that confirms that Healy's actually did misrepresent the vase to deliberately mislead buyers, and not just for some other reason, as the principle says one is guilty of misrepresentation if the opinions are stated in a way to deliberately mislead buyers. Answer choice E does just that.

its happening to me right now

wait yes absolutely, I am so confused by this too