excuse my language, but this is a shit question; rather shit answers

This is one of those that i was able to catch and retain the info during my original read and thus it requires me to reread which takes extra time. are there any tips or tricks someone recommends doing to getting this right without spending much valuable time?

took me 2 days, but i got it. now working on getting it down to 1min30 sec which might take 2 weeks.

No way i can solve/answer this in 1min30sec.

This seems more like a level 4 or 5 difficulty because of its structure.

Answer C is a valid inference, thus is true. Heres why: ALL CH and Rest are PP. Most well designed PP feature artwork. Since all CH and Rest are PP, we can conclude that most CH that are well designed ALSO feature artwork just like Most PP do, because a CH falls within a PP therefore that must be true. But so does a Restaurant. The explanation in the video is not a good one because the relationship stated in the stimulus is between public places and artwork (and again all CH and Restaurants are PP). If answer C had MOST CH AND RESTAURANTS, then it would be a 100% correct. But, D is more true.

Following this logic:

• Original: Some A are B

• Negated: No A are B

• Original: A ←s→ B

• Negated: A → /B

Why isn't the last part no /A→ B, because the negated above reads No A are B ?

@EllaLoy im with you. this is weird. but as another person pointed above, "only if" is to mean just the "5+ mins", if somebody is 6 mins late, then they may or may not be cited. "ONLY IF" only includes 5 minutes on the dot. LOL 5:01 late, no longer valid/sufficient to be cited.