Just a shade over that, so essentially right there with you!

Look forward to attending!

Whew... I've been studying with LSAC materials with paper and pencil. on my own. This is the start of a new chapter. I've been studying for about 3 months so far and feel like I have a handle on the 'general theory' as JY puts it... but I'm exciting for a much more involved process of studying.

In the words of Miyamoto Musashi - 'Walk the thousand mile road, step by step.'

Solidarity, friend! In a similar situation.... a high-stress job and switching gears in the evening to review LSAT. I try to spend 2-3hrs every day... there may be a rest day here and there, but that's been my routine.

I'm not the best at learning on my own and just started with lessons from Powerscore per recommendation from a friend. Hopefully it pans out, but it's not easy. Especially on tough days you start studying and then just get owned in drills. It's a grind. But, from folks who've shared their advice with me that are - 1) currently in law school AND 2) current lawyers - the LSAT isn't what makes a good lawyer. It's these words I have to tell myself constantly because this isn't easy, at least for me, especially when you hear stuff in these comments threads like 'OMG I GOT A 183 CAN I STILL GO TO HARVARD?'

One foot in front of the other. We're going to get through this. You are killing it and I wish you the best of luck in your journey. Digital hug/high-five/battle cry.

Alright, I admittedly did something really stupid with this question and going to use this opportunity for anyone who made a similar mistake.

I initially chose A. So right off the bat, the modifier/predicate in the second sentence threw me off. During the Blind Review, I read that answer and it 'felt' wrong to me. I couldn't quite put my finger on it at the time and then changed my answer to B due to the reference in the last sentence about the environment. In that case, I was easily lulled by the wording and didn't keep the bigger picture in mind.

This might be the most time I've spent on a question, but I finally understand it! B is flat wrong because there's no reference to dwindling land space. And A talks about cheetahs broadly. Cheetahs live as far away as South Asia. So A would cover cheetahs in all locations, which is way beyond the scope of the question.

I hope this is helpful for anyone else who might be struggling with this question.