#5. I got the right answer, BUT, did I get to the right answer correctly? I used both rules "in order" for number 5. I diagrammed the word that followed right after the suff./nec. indicator and used the rules for both. Here is how I did it:

"No under can undergo this transformation" = x -> /undergo

"...without faving a trial" = /facing a trial -> y

Put together, and it is "/facing a trial -> /undergo"

Can we do it like this? Am I overthinking? I would really appreciate a response - thank you!

Need help on this question:

3.) Wouldn't it be [things cost more -> buy less and use less] and contrapositive would then have to be [/buy less or /use less -> /things cost more]?

5.) Same idea here. Wouldn't it technically be [tree -> perennial plant and elongated stem], therefore making the contrapositive [/perennial plant or /elongated stem -> /tree]?

How do you know when to, and when NOT to, use the "and" when using Lawgic? This really trips me up- I would really appreciate help with this. Thank you!