Making this post because JY and Bojack prompted me to (haha)
I wish I could post a screenshot of my analytics here; they paint a better picture of my progress.
Long story short, I've been prepping on and off since September last year. I truly believe that, unless you're a freak of logic and are just genetically predisposed to the sort of thinking required for this exam, you need to be prepared to grind it out for the long haul. Taking breaks (even month-long ones) is perfectly okay so long as you recognize that you'll have to build yourself back up again after a lengthy one (it's just like building strength & muscle in the gym).
If you have any questions, feel free to ask!
Honestly, I feel like I still have a long way to go. When you get a 180 on a PT here, JY sends you a message where Bojack tells you that you have no more room to improve, but I don't think that's the case. I can still improve on time, and I really need to have no room for error if I am to achieve my goal of getting a 178+ (preferably a 180) on the October LSAT.
So don't take my words as gospel haha. I'm definitely not an LSAT god or anything yet.
Safe travels everyone.
P.S. I'm actually wondering whether I should just skip to later PTs (I've been taking PTs one by one in order), and I'm also wondering how much PTs in the 40s differ from PTs in the 90s. Can someone with experience help me out here? I don't think I can take the rest of the PTs (46 - 93) by October 14, so I'm wondering how I should tackle them by that time.
I think this sentence:
"An employer should therefore engage the employee in a nonthreatening dialogue that emphasizes the positive contributions of the employee to the development of such ideas."
is actually the conclusion.
"Then the ideas employers want to try will be implemented more quickly and effectively."
This sentence provides a reason why an employer should take the recommended course of action. Therefore, it is a premise.
The recommended course of action, engaging the employee in a nonthreatening dialogue, would be the conclusion.
Is there something I'm not seeing?