it is a bit of a predicament. suddenly we're inheriting a type of test that hasn't fundamentally changed since the 1990s. the good thing is they're simplifying it, not complicating it. just shift your focus from LG to other areas. i'm sure 7sage is scrambling to adjust their curriculum for the next year.
it is a bit of a predicament. suddenly we're inheriting a type of test that hasn't fundamentally changed since the 1990s. the good thing is they're simplifying it, not complicating it. just shift your focus from LG to other areas. i'm sure 7sage is scrambling to adjust their curriculum for the next year.
Are the new prep tests scored with an experimental section in mind? In other words, is one of the four sections experimental, and if so, is it excluded from the score?
Looking for in-person study buddies in the area- hoping to take any exam prior to next cycle. I can provide a calendar for us to populate. This is also a good way to explore new cafes/study spots in the Bay! The primary purpose of this is to provide accountability and motivation (stemming from a bit of healthy competition). HMU!!
yeah wasting questions in half-hearted drills is a big n-no. if you don't have the energy then don't try to study, it's not very productive
this is the type of question i have to accept i'd get incorrect. in no way am i able to understand why A "fills the gap" between those wanting to read Homer and the translators having mansucripts lying around.
Curious what people think about this question. The second rationale is essentially that a punishment should fit the severity of the crime. Applied to the answer choices, we are to understand that we are not looking for an exact match, but rather a consistent parallel form of reasoning.
So, rationale: punishment = severity of crime.
A: Correctness = fairness
B: Correctness = what society deems correct
C: Correctness = consequences + inherent fairness
D: Correctness = consequences + intuitive rightness
E: Correctness = consequences
Curious on why A is the best answer. Fairness? Is this because attaching fairness to the correctness of an action is consistent with determining the severity of a punishment on the severity of the crime? There's no clear linkage.
the explanation for why E is incorrect is really bleh. the reason we should be eliminating E is because we are introduced to the premise that consumers should buy ONLY from independent bookstores, and so any principle that even suggests that one should turn to a chain bookstore if other options are exhausted wouldn't strengthen/justify our argument.