this was my same line of reasoning

interested!

19 is also correct since the study had them locate fracture zones

Id like the link!

How do we know in 14 the author does not care what the general public thinks? Who is this passage directed towards as the audience?

#help (Added by Admin)

Answer D says "for soil to remain healthy" that seems too broad of a statement to be correct

"unemployed" retired people, these people can not have part time jobs

A I disqualified because no one has been abducted and to be wholly truthful the statement needs to be true, it does not matter if the person THINKS its true, it didnt happen its not true

Did not notice how it was a reconcile question, was trying to support the wine store owners conclusion

If you apply B to the inadequate vs adequate definition the reasoning to get rid of the answer still works since nothing would be considered addictive under inadequate definition so more would would be considered addictive under the second definition

E I eliminated due to the "numerous other substances" since we have no idea what the other substances are it may just be that the other substances arent in the water anymore which is why the plankton went away, but maybe the domoic acid is still in the water tainting the fish

For B the answer also says "most" of the endangered animals will not survive, while the passage says "some" endangered animals live in these forest fragments

5) C I mistakenly read the first paragraph to imply the ministers were engaged by CORE because they already were working on mission in construction industry

How I am interpreting E in order for it to be correct is lets say a faculty member made 20 pieces of IP in a year. But 15 of those pieces of IP in their portfolio were created with what the university defines as significant amounts of their resources, so the degree of ownership by the university of the faculty's whole portfolio is 15/20. But maybe a diff faculty only had 2 /20 of their years IP work claimed. So ownership will vary case by case when considering a persons whole body of work.