- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
Admissions profile
Discussions
uggggghhhhhhh lol next time compare my two ac, and look for what is different between them ughhhhhh
In the criminal justice system, rushing through question a stimulus considered especially heinous. In New York City, the dedicated detectives who conquer these vicious felonies are members of an elite squad known as 170ers. These are their stories.
I totally missed that in the experiment both groups received the same treatment. With MSS I need to "formulate a conclusion". Reading the stimulus carefully, and especially in the 80s is key! 170 leh go si vous plait
In the criminal justice system, not reading carefully each part of the stimulus is considered especially heinous. In New York City, the dedicated detectives who conquer these vicious felonies are members of an elite squad known as 170ers. These are their stories.
MOST COMMON FORM, understand carefully the stimulus! LSAC will trip you up with "common" and other words like this so you better read carefully each sentence of the stimulus!
In the criminal justice system, making unnecessary assumptions of MSS is especially heinous. In New York City, the dedicated detectives who conquer these vicious felonies are members of an elite squad known as 170ers. These are their stories.
also can is your friend, and provable!
lol. I know this is a hard question when I see heart shaped box struggling
wack, but doing better!
I had the correct AC timed, but changed it during BR! to E, Likely I was overthinking..... I think I added way too many assumptions, and lost in my own thought.
Sometimes it's better to keep it simple, and go with your gut!
In the criminal justice system, not making sure the comparison in the stimulus meant something are considered especially heinous. In New York City, the dedicated detectives who conquer these vicious felonies are members of an elite squad known as 170ers. These are their stories.
In the criminal justice system, not resolving both items of the stimulus is considered especially heinous. In New York City, the dedicated detectives who conquer these vicious felonies are members of an elite squad known as 170ers. These are their stories.
In this example, I chose E and but AC D is resolves both why 1 trap sucks, and why more traps is the key to success.
In the criminal justice system, not picking an AC with a more of a direct connection to the discrepancy is considered especially heinous. In New York City, the dedicated detectives who conquer these vicious felonies are members of an elite squad known as 170ers. These are their stories.
I asked before with some help with LGs and now have perfected those! Now I am onto conquering RCs, and LRs. LR is where I think I can make some decent improvement.
Overall on my PTs I can get 163-166.
RC ranges from -4 to -7. That I am seeing a little improvement here and there.
LR can range from -4 to -7 as well.
LR I feel like I've been on a struggle bus. I work full time, so I do one PT a week, BR, and then try to review it. I also have tried to add some drilling of LRs I feel weak in. (Particularly NAs, PSAs, sometimes MSS).
One thing I have noticed is sometimes I make mistakes from reading a question stem, ac, or stimulus, and miss a VITAL Word! so sometimes I make dumb mistakes here and there....ugh
I am finding with my wrong journal-ling/BR, I know the question stems pretty well and what to do. I often just fall for traps answers as well. In particular the last 5 questions of the section usually beat me up.
I kinda also feel like drilling has made me worse?
Anyways, any advice or tips would be helpful! Is it dumb to drop LR drilling, and just review my wrong journal?
Any tips of how to review wrong journal better?
#help#help Can someone reexplain AC B please! I would love to read some different things about it. I got it right AC, but JY's diagram feels like half of an explanation
In the criminal justice system, not following the question stem process for PSA and resolving the discrepancy instead are considered especially heinous. In New York City, the dedicated detectives who conquer these vicious felonies are members of an elite squad known as 170ers. These are their stories.
Principle → Conclusion!
I think you should focus more on the argument's conclusion instead, do the negation grand slam thingy. And see if the negated ACs destroys the argument's conclusion.
When I translate AC B, I go like you did "always" to "never". But when I compare that negated AC to the conclusion it didn't feel powerful enough
In the criminal justice system, not thinking about valid argument forms when diagramming are considered especially heinous. In New York City, the dedicated detectives who conquer these vicious felonies are members of an elite squad known as 170ers. These are their stories.
Also, be on the look out for little things like C ←s→/A versus A ←s→/C. Classic rookie cop mistake.
#help Like Rhizomes, which Core Curriculum lessons should I revisit ?? #help
@ponyrox898-Stop is this username because the Hamilton song? lol I was just listening to it....
I should have used the two premise together and formulate an "inference" that is provable by the stimulus. I got trapped trying to understand the stimulus, I need to stray from this distraction and pick an AC that can come from the two statements combined......MSS
In the criminal justice system, MSS not answered as provable inferences are considered especially heinous. In New York City, the dedicated detectives who conquer these vicious felonies are members of an elite squad known as 170ers. These are their stories.
Randomly got overwhelmed by the stimulus, and chose an AC that strengthens a premise. Slow down Olivia, we can crack this case.
I need to identify the conclusion, and from there look at my premise, and then strengthen it with "another premise" aka answer choice
In the criminal justice system, rushing through question stimulus without properly identifying conclusions are considered especially heinous. In New York City, the dedicated detectives who conquer these vicious felonies are members of an elite squad known as 170ers. These are their stories.
I am going to score 90 percentile on my LSAT and dance for joy when I see 170 above !