Never spell Aaron like that again.

Error I noticed in the video:

One of the first things we learned was not to make assumptions. The writer assumed that raccoons would lose the battle to bears. We don't know how many racoons there are, multiple racoons could in fact beat a bear, or the bear could retreat from a single racoon if that racoon were intimidating enough.

Just thought this was extremely relevant to the lesson.

What I am confused about is how the Tiger argument is weaker than the Disney argument. They seem equal to me: If tigers are a mammal, and an aggressive one, than yes, explicitly, not every mammal is suitable for being a pet. How is this argument any weaker than the Disney argument?