Hello, I'd personally wait for the next cycle. I would have my personal statement and everything in order and ready to go. Come September I would start applying asap. I took a full year off and come 2023 I will score high and be ready by September. If you get the score that your happy with in February then I would apply asap shortly after. If not, then wait till September. By then, hopefully you would haven taken the LSAT and gotten a score your happy with. Patience, everything will fall into place.

Hi, thank you for taking the time out to reply. I think I was way over thinking this big time and it didn't help that I was exhausted. I was trying to show that if N-m->/A, then the conclusion is invalid because as you stated there would be a some relationship in the conclusion rather then a most. Now in regards to the second list, I meant to put / next to the A. Bottom line is that N-m->/A doesn't allow the conclusion to be true and N—>/A does. Is this correct?

I'm in!

Wow, I shouldn't have missed this LOL! Weak sauce.

Well when do you plan on taking the LSAT?

I would love to join as well.

Loyola Law School here we come!

This is one hell of a question. The key to understanding this question is to understand that that the nesting boxes aren't well hidden because the boxes are crowed. Now if the boxes are well hidden then parasitic behavior is rarer. It's safe to infer that some ducks lay there eggs in boxes because they aren't well hidden.

Hope this helps! This took me awhile to understand and then suddenly, the logic clicked.

Im innnnnnnn :)

I got this question correct however, what messed me up was the sufficient condition "without". Can someone please do the conditional logic for the "without"?

#help

Wow, I feel that was an easy question I shouldn't have missed. I picked E however, had I read carefully I would of read that E is talking about other non profit groups as well. Answer choice A is the only answer choice that must be true based on the stimulus.

I'm in LOL PEEP THE NAME!

Ok so this is a pretty confusing question because I had a hard time understanding the passage however; let me explain why A is the correct answer choice for myself and others. Basically, if for instance fisherman could catch 10,000 fish a day before the law but after the law was imposed, fisherman can only catch 1,000 fish a day then the demand for these fish will increase. Prices are going to increase because many people want these fish. I hope this helps someone.

@ Hello, if possible may I receive it as well? Thank you so much!

Wow ok so I chose E and then C on blind review. Answer E weakens the argument because if MANY criminals don't have access to photocopiers then why should the special ink even be adopted? Now answer choice C messed me up because I made a big assumption. I thought well if microprinting paper has fewer steps then say special ink then yes we should adopt special ink because it's a process that takes longer and criminals wont be able to do that process. Lmao such a terrible assumption. Answer choice A definitely strengthens the argument because if cost is being considered then it makes sense that one would want special ink currency because THIS CURRENCLY CAN BE DETECTED EASILY. I feel that this is a shitty answer choice but rather, it's the only answer choice that strengthens the argument.

Dude fuck this question. SMH I hate you LSAT writers.

Stay positive and be persistent. We got this! Don't give up. Make a schedule and stick to it.

Ok so I'm overthinking this and I'm confused. I picked answer choice C and I see why it's wrong but in regards to answer choice D, how is this the answer? Jack didn't pick neither George nor his mom. If jack picked his mom, then she would benefit more than George because there is more people; yet he didn't. What am I missing here?

#help

Dumbass question smh! I hate you so much LSAC.

This is one hell of an argument. I understand (sort of), why answer E is the answer however this answer choice seems like it destroys the premise which is wont we don't want. We need to destroy the support. What am I missing here? I don't understand exactly what E is doing?

#help (Added by Admin

I picked answer choice C however, I realize why it's wrong. The trick to getting this answer correct was realizing that the manager was aware of the delay and the word foreseeable correlates with foreseeable. Also, now that I think about it, POE helps with this question because the other answer choices are plain wrong for a variety of reasons.

Wow, I picked answer choice B and it's rather obvious why this wouldn't be the answer choice.

Hello, I'm sure you've gotten some pretty good responses however, I would like to chime in. I'm in the same exact boat as you. Here's the thing. Your studying way to much and from the sound of it, it sounds like your burning out and your going overboard. Take a step back and reevaluate yourself. I wouldn't study more than 4 hours / 5 days a week. Sure you can do more however, remember these words: "quality or quantity". Make a schedule and stick to do. Be sure to get some exercise in as well. I'm telling you, this takes time! If it makes you feel better, I took the Princeton review and fucking bombed meaning I did horrible on my first LSAT and now I'm on 7sage and doing it all over again. Stop being hard on yourself and learn to take breaks. We're not gods, but we're humans and we can only do so much each day before our brain say's "ok, no more. I need a break!". Feel free to message me if you'd like any advice.

Ok so I'm confused as hell. I understand why answer choice D is correct however, the conclusion mentions that a thermometer could be accurate if PLUS 1 or Minus 1. Answer choice D says the temperature is different if PLUS 2. This answer choice seems like it would strengthen rather than weaken because PLUS 1 could be way more than 2 which aligns with answer choice D. What am I missing here? #help #help

Wow! Ok so what messed me up is I didn't realize that intellectual is similar to cognitive. I picked answer choice E and this answer doesn't do shit. I need to assume that serious athletes are aware of their cognitive abilities however, that's an extreme assumption I need to make for answer choice E. This is a well written question that confused the hell out of me.