Subscription pricing
Hello, I have been studying for a handful of months now after I rushed way too early last febuary and bombed the test with a 139 7 lower than my diagnostic.(I hate tests) I was aiming for this February to take it again in hopes that I could achieve a score in the mid 150s. Except it just seems that no matter what I do I cannot figure out this test. Lately I have been slowly going through the course and just drilling question types as many times as possible in hopes that I slowly start to develop strategies and then take another PT. Ive been told this is not hard to do multiple times from people but I just feel lost. Any advice or a breakdown of what your study schedule was I would appreciate. Mid 150s would get me into a decent law school :) but as of now Im basically just losing hope :/
This is such a dumbass question that definitely should not be on the LSAT. You can argue the program helped them get a higher gpa and want to join another team... and in general if the argument is stating they saw higher achievement levels how does it "weaken" the argument to say they joined a team that needs a high gpa...that they could have obtained..after the program(due to it). thereby strengthening the argument. If anyone else thinks this isn't the right train of thought by all means please help me understand.