I think some admissions boards might hold waived LORs in higher regard (compared to un-waived) because they know that what was written was the honest, uninfluenced opinion of the recommender. Some recommenders (if not most) also prefer you to waive the right to view the letter because it shows that you trust them enough to write you a great LOR.

I'd be interested in joining!

I think the length of the passage threw me off. I ended up reading it multiple times and rushed to pick D because time was running out :(

Interested!

Hi, I'd be interested in joining a study group if you start one!

Just finished, I had RC-LR-LG-RC

@ said:

It was interesting to see the text sources for RC passages at the end of the test. There was the predictable bunch, ala The Economist and NYT. I also saw a couple of article from Financial Times and one from an ACLU publication.

Definitely going to start reading The Economist to prep for the October exam lol. Business and science related RC passages are my worst.

I think most schools have rolling admission, so the earlier you apply the greater your chances of getting in are. So since T14's are extremely competitive, applying earlier would give you a greater chance of getting in. (if you use 7sage's admissions predictor you can see how your admission chances fluctuate based on what month you plan to apply) That's not to say that T14's never admit anyone after December, but by December they've probably admitted a decent amount of people, so there might not be as many spots left, and your chances of getting in go down.

When you do this question in a MBF problem set and still miss the word violate :'(

160+ on the October LSAT!

Interested!