This question tricked me. The passage suggests... means that the author of the passage suggesting something, not Taruskin himself. In the first paragraph it was the author objectively citing what Taruskin himself says, not that its suggesting anything about Taruskin's position. The last paragraph of the passage is where the author actually talked/suggested about how Taruskin must engage in something, which is the Freudian analysis part.

Bruh, as someone who has an immigrant background from Asia and does not live in the US, I totally thought African American and American are the same thing. How ironic the passage itself talked about segregation and yet the AC today still segregates the fact that African American are not necessarily American...

wow if i were to just read A and B id be totally destroyed by trying to understand B alone

@ConnerKline But supercomputers are able to compute though? Being slow and inefficient most certainly does not mean that they are unable to compute. How is this not a flaw? Say that a low-watt stove top is slow and inefficient in boiling water (compared to kettles), does it mean that the stove top is unable to boil water?

I don't really understand. The supercomputers are not unable to accurately predict... they can, but they are instead just too slow and inefficient. Unable should = cannot. How can B be correct? This is an obvious flaw.

Should read the question carefully and take a break if you chose C... this is a pure fatigue trap

E ruled out a possibility of reversed cause, hence strengthening the argument. All the other answer choices were somewhat irrelevant to the conclusion of the argument (how snoring and abnormality had a correlation).

Did this question by diagramming and hunted directly for the answer i was looking for, didn't even read the rest of the answer choices. Might actually be a potentially good method, as some of those answer choices are really misleading. I only noticed how B was misleading after I submitted my answer. Got 29 seconds under!