I am interested. Thank you for doing this!

Thanks a lot @ !

Congratulations!!!

@ Thank you, for some reason I was thinking of this upcoming June when I read the post lol

@.edensmith me too.

Hi Juliet, thank you for the update. Is the August administration in person instead of online?

I agree with the comments above. I think flashcards and real examples from the LSAT will help a lot. I also found that for each form if you try to come up with your own examples it makes it easier to see the patterns of reasoning.

Hi Selene, thank you very much!

It's Method of Reasoning, https://classic.7sage.com/lesson/how-to-approach-method-of-reasoning-questions/

Thank you so much for this! It's very helpful.

Thank you so much for this post and for offering the tutoring session. I love that you included a charity component too. I am interested as well.

You can find the lesson here https://classic.7sage.com/lesson/two-types-of-biconditionals/. In your example, "U serves on a different committee from that on which G serves." This is the always apart, never together biconditional because the rule states U and G have to be on different teams. It doesn't matter which one we cross out because in our biconditional chain they both indicate the same idea that they have to be always apart. When we unchain the biconditional, U (----)/G, we get U ---->/G and it's contrapositive G ---->/U. From this we can say that when U is in, G is out. Also, when G is in, U is out.

Now let's split this /U (----) G, we get /U ----> G and it's contrapositive /G ----> U. From this we can say that when U is out, G is in. When G is out, U is in. You see how we are really saying the same thing and it doesn't matter which one we cross out as long as we know that they are always apart and never together. Both of our chains indicate the same thing. The biconditional chain saves us time when we do games so that we don't have to write out the rules when we can just represent them in one chain. I hope this helps.

I think doing timed sections to see where your understanding is and your timing will help you transition better to doing full PT's rather than just doing PT after another. If your understanding is not solid, your score will reflect that and you'll waste valuable PT's for the future.

I couldn't agree more with the above comments. I think it's best to take the LSAT when your PT scores reflect your desired score. As @ stated you should take the LSAT when you feel that this will be your last time taking it and you know that you'll be performing to the best of your ability.

Thank you both for this webinar! It was very informative and helpful.

Hi there,

Great questions. I was curious as well and found this discussion https://classic.7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/13068

It's very helpful.

Thank you for doing this Joon! Looking forward to it!

Thank you!!

Really enjoyed this podcast, great tips, thank you both. Congratulations Rochisha! LOL at the zoom school comment JY

Thank you!! Looking forward to the session.

I agree with @. Sign up for the exam when you are consistently scoring at your target score or above on timed practice tests. Take your time studying, find out ways to make it fun using your specific learning style. Be easy on yourself and give your self a fair chance instead of rushing it. Breathe,you got this, one day at a time.

Thank you so much again Kole! Great resource and great tips! I am going to start fool proofing games and I will implement the strategies you mentioned.

This is great! Thank you so much for sharing Kole!

Thank you so much JY!!! Looking forward to it !!!

Congratulations on your acceptance! Best of luck in Law School!!