Does anyone know the last time a logic game like PT #11, game 4 or PT#12 game four appeared on the LSAT?
- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
your awesome
Thanks
LSAC is in business to make money and Cambridge's license has not yet expired.
take it all three times if you like. they will take the highest despite their policy.
the cambridge sets are comprehensive from 1-38, the 7 sage is not. definitely get cambridge!
the ones with 26 questions are easier to me for some reason......
the only thing that was hard about it was figuring out the new composition/rock inference. but yea easy section.
I think everyone goes through this, I'm just going to do the best i can and if i don't make it I'm sure ill get over it. Maybe consider cutting back on TLS.
they are all curved if that helps, so like if 80 points yields a 165... that would be a pretty tough test.
your right about that. i love this course and i feel really good about the 600 dollars or so i spent on it, but it would be very hard to argue that losing the pdf's has not significantly affected the value of the course. the change will add $200 at a minimum to what the average 7sager must now spend for their prep (i doubt many people will see second hand marked on pretests as a real option). not to mention the fact that many of the early tests are not available through lsac and then the HUGE pain of putting together the packets on your own... however at the end of the day 7sage is still the best option just as it was before. the playing field is level and there will always be a demand for lsat prep.
thats nice and all but unfortunately doesn't make sense.
they didn't skip a beat.
emli, how do you personally go about drilling specific question types in RC?
im not sure that having the same setup = having the same sections in the same order. if you go to the tls june waiters thread you should be able to determine which lr section you had was experimental.
hah np, just beware it is addictive
awesome article.
Just go to the TLS june waiters thread. it has all been established. it is not hard to tell. especially if you had 2 rc/lg.
if you want to know what the experimental were just go to TLS
A troubling although possibly incorrect inference: the LG videos that are free and open to the public have no written lsat content in them. The explanations within the paid course do. Follow?
we still have not been explicitly informed that the explanations will remain.
i had the same experience with pt50
don't take it at gsu in atlanta, your desk will be less than 1.5 feet wide
I recently scored a 172 on PT50, prior to this my highest score had been a 168 which i have hit 3 times in total. the day before i got the 172, i got a 162 on PT74. this makes me kind of question the 172 in that it was scored on a relatively early test and is far above my usual range ( average 165 on the analytics). Any thoughts?