Self-paced
I was curious when we should be able to see the analytics of each question on PT 159? Would like to know the difficulty.
refatmuwalla356
- Joined
- Aug 2025
- Subscription
- Free
Admissions profile
LSAT
161
CAS GPA
Not provided
1L START YEAR
Not provided
Applications
Arizona
In process
Arizona
In process
Arizona State
In process
Arizona State
In process
FSU
In process
FSU
In process
George Mason
In process
George Mason
In process
George Washington
In process
George Washington
In process
Houston
In process
Houston
In process
Illinois - Urbana
In process
Illinois - Urbana
In process
Iowa
In process
Iowa
In process
Kansas
In process
Kansas
In process
Loyola - Chicago
In process
Loyola - Chicago
In process
Marquette
In process
Marquette
In process
Miami
In process
Miami
In process
Missouri
In process
Missouri
In process
Nebraska
In process
Nebraska
In process
Penn State
In process
Penn State
In process
Pepperdine
In process
Pepperdine
In process
Stetson
In process
Stetson
In process
Temple University
In process
Temple University
In process
Tulane
In process
Tulane
In process
UC - Davis
In process
UC - Davis
In process
UCONN
In process
UCONN
In process
U Florida
In process
U Florida
In process
USD
In process
USD
In process
U Washington
In process
U Washington
In process
William & Mary
In process
William & Mary
In process
Discussions
refatmuwalla356
Saturday, Feb 7
@IvonneRosario I understand, I just remember seeing comments from JY and Kevin saying "Likely this week" or "Very very soon" so I was expecting that. Do you have any idea of when it will be released?
refatmuwalla356
Edited Monday, Jan 26
@Jackielynn honestly take my comment with a grain of salt because I struggled with this question as well. Based on the explanation video, I kind of see what they’re saying. I would like you to focus on simply just the conclusion as well as the last sentence regarding the seven day cycle having too little significance. That premise (the last sentence of the stimulus) is only talking about seven day cycles, however, what if there was a non-seven day cycle? Could that NATURAL cycle have enough significance to constitute as an explanation to the phenomenon? If so, the argument is destroyed, we can no longer sufficiently conclude that the explanation to the phenomenon is due to non-natural (people’s) influences.
My main issue with that answer choice is we don’t know whether a non-seven day cycle can constitute as an explanation to the phenomenon, so it doesn’t destroy the argument completely when negated, just slightly.
If anyone has any criticisms to my comment, please let me know.
@Kevin_Lin Would greatly appreciate an update on the video explanation being implemented.