Does anyone else feel like the correct answer on this one, C, attacks the premise directly? The Stem says that if we lower opera production costs so that they can be funded purely by box office tickets, we can do away with large corporate sponsorships which only play the most famous operas. AC C (for a weakener Q) states that operas cannot be funded without the help of large corporate sponsorships. Is this question one of those very rare ones where we do in fact attack the premise or am I misunderstanding something else about this question?
- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
I don't know your personal situation, but you only get so many attempts at this test in so many years. If this score doesn't materialize for you, then that's just one fewer chances to get the score you want.
Secondly, if you're coming out of undergrad and have the means to wait, then wait on law school! Taking a gap year to get a job related to whatever field of law you are interested in, no matter if its just answering calls or filing digital papers, will give you a lot of perspective on what kinds of law you want to study, what kind of attorney you want to be, or if you really even want to be an attorney at all. Law school isn't a bed of roses by any means, nor is the drivel of actually practicing law. A little time, clarity, and real world experience might really impact your perspective. I myself am taking a gap year while working at a local firm and studying for the LSAT and have another friend who is moving to a new state to pursue nonprofit consulting to see if they prefer that.
This opinion really applies only if you do have those times and means. If life is moving fast and you can't afford to wait, then I would say why bother to ponder the question and dedicate your heart to putting together the best application materials you can!
Any case, good luck dude, and sucks about your last test. COVID is a bih
To anyone else going through Prep Tests chronologically, was this question a bother for you as well? It's about two people arguing over whether or not they should modify their 36 hour training shifts for prospective physicians. The answer, B, does not to me feel like it is the sound logical weakener that the question makes it out to be. B seems to be unrelated to the topic unless you make another assumption that the degree of illness a patient receives is a factor in why a doctor needs to make better medical decisions not generally but all the time. While this logic probably flies in an older LSAT, I feel that newer ones would write this question off. However, I still wanted a second opinion considering God JY hasn't put out explanations for the LR sections in this Prep Test.
Anyone having trouble accessing the score breakdown? I thought that the score breakdown would be immediately available to all of us once our scores were posted on LSAC?
Update: Apparently they stopped disclosing LSAT's after the FLEX got popular during the pandemic and have not restarted the practice. Oh well, more PT's for me I guess!
Hey peeps! I just got my score back (decent but will definitely be retaking it in Feb) and was trying to see my score breakdown to see which questions I got right and wrong, but LSAT says these files are "unavailable". To my knowledge the Nov 2021 LSAT is disclosed, and when the LSAT is disclosed score reports are available immediately. Does anyone know how I can access the score breakdown?
Update: Apparently God-Emperor LSAC has decided to discontinue disclosing recent LSAT scores for the time being. They stopped allowing score breakdowns to be released since the pandemic began and the LSAT Flex got popularized. Hopefully they'll add it back eventually. Until then, PT's for me!
My friend, if you are unsatisfied with the services 7Sage provides, then you are free to cancel your subscription. I do not see why you went through the trouble of purchasing a product just to post your contempt for it on its own discussion boards when a simple google review would accomplish much of the same if not more. Furthermore, 7Sage is a learning community based on support, and I do not see how your comment fosters either a helpful community or support structure. Finally, your main advice, the importance of drilling, is a piece of advice that almost EVERY video on 7Sage will tell you. It is embedded in the curriculum itself, rather than being some sort of fact that you seem to presume 7Sage wants to hide for its own profits.
relay
noun
1.
a group of people or animals engaged in a task or activity for a fixed period of time and then replaced by a similar group.
verb
1.
to receive and pass on (information or a message).
rely
verb
1.
to depend on with full trust or confidence.
I'm about two weeks into studying with 7Sage, and I've had a question for a while. Should we complete the syllabus linearly or can we jump around? Should we even be encouraged to jump around? I feel like my skills with Logic Games, for example, are languishing because I'm doing a lot of (useful) prep on basic logic. So, should I continue the course and get back to Logic Games when they come up in the formatting of the syllabus, after almost EVERY logical reasoning section (in reality, 100's of hours of practice from now), or should I try to keep my skills with Logic Games sharp (-7 timed, -1 BR currently) by doing some intermittent practice with them along the way? If so, what should that practice look like?
Maybe I missed something that was explained at the very outset of the syllabus?
I know this will probably be a minority position, given the results, but I did not outline the essay either in the textbox or on scratch paper, just in my head. Clicked No so I could submit the results for the first question