Don't eat the money, go ahead take it, and cancel if need be, but at least its good practice and don't show up again until you're scoring consistently in the PTs
Seems like a pseudo sufficient assumption type question, or necessary/sufficient rather than basing itself off conditional statements, you'd want to question the relationship between taxes and good leadership. b) Being opposed to high taxes isn't sufficient for good leadership
Displays this relationship, and perhaps the pseudo sufficient is that, opposed to higher taxes is 'necessary' as in it will 'do'. Check out JY's explanation on the CC of this Q type.
All that anxiety and whatever is your brains way of telling you that you will feel even worse on test day, if you don't study hard enough. So use it as a motivator.
'Were going to need to split this game board up'
Can't wait!
I believe the old majors are falling and new ones are rising, it’ll be an Iceland v Russia finish, with Putin coming down on a helicopter forcing the game into penalties but then Thor interrupts the decisive kick giving Iceland the game.
'well this is turning out creepier than I imagined' I lol'd
Doing pretty well hammered down on LR the past few months now I'm working on mastering LG, and you?
My fav band atm is JY and the 7 Sagers
'false belief' caught me off-guard so I went with C. Thought it was a big assumption to make. But I get it does make the 'never' in C questionable as well.
I love how weakens except is really just strengthen, or 'does nothing at all'.
I really like how JY held off on choosing B as the right answer for this explanation, because it simulates what most of us would do until we arrived E and were forced to eliminate one.
Same here.
Hey guys, I've been studying on my own for a while but it would be interesting to hear someone else's take on the Q's and the test, I'm looking forward to hearing from some of you who may be in the Miami area and are looking to study LSAT as well. Cheers!
During section 2 I get a bit of a crick in my neck, I previously asked the proctor how high can I raise my test booklet off the table and she said she'd 'just let me know' big mistake! During section 3 I had it raised off the desk and she stood in front of me during a LG question and started waving her hands, startling and distracting me from this already difficult task. Luckily I'm certain it was an experimental section. Anyone have a similar issue with this test?
Executive: ESTJ, -A/-T just like Judge Judy
For you guys who aren't keen on personality profiles, try taking the test with an open mind and try to answer reflexively instead of reactively. Sometimes if we take too long to answer the question, cognitive dissonance can cloud the accuracy of the results.
I'm listening to the 89 pt increase! And will join the pep rally, this is just what I needed!